Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development

How, what, why and when?

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Krishma Labib (VU University Medical Centre)

Daniel Pizzolato (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)

P.J. Stappers (TU Delft - Codesigning Social Change)

Natalie Evans (VU University Medical Centre)

Iris Lechner (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Guy Widdershoven (VU University Medical Centre)

Lex Bouter (VU University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Chris Diericks (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)

Katinka Bergema (Zwaluw)

Joeri Tijdink (VU University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2154154 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Journal title
Accountability in Research
Issue number
6
Volume number
31 (2024)
Pages (from-to)
531-556
Downloads counter
381
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Existing research integrity (RI) guideline development methods are limited in including various perspectives. While co-creation methods could help to address this, there is little information available to researchers and practitioners on how, why and when to use co-creation for developing RI guidelines, nor what the outcomes of co-creation methods are. In this paper, we aim to address this gap. First, we discuss how co-creation methods can be used for RI guideline development, based on our experience of developing RI guidelines. We elaborate on steps including preparation of the aims and design; participant sensitization; organizing and facilitating workshops; and analyzing data and translating them into guidelines. Secondly, we present the resulting RI guidelines, to show what the outcome of co-creation methods are.Thirdly, we reflect on why and when researchers might want to use co-creation methods for developing RI guidelines. We discuss that stakeholder engagement and inclusion of diverse perspectives are key strengths of co-creation methods. We also reflect that co-creation methods have the potential to make guidelines implementable if followed by additional steps such as revision working groups. We conclude that co-creation methods are a valuable approach to creating new RI guidelines when used together with additional methods.