Planning in a Global Era. Andy Thornley & Yvonne Rydin (Eds). Aldershot, Ashgate, 2002. 448 pp., £49.00 (hbk). ISBN 0 7546 1943 5

Review (2004)
Author(s)

M Spaans (TU Delft - Urban Development Management)

Research Group
Urban Development Management
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2004
Language
English
Research Group
Urban Development Management
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Issue number
5
Volume number
19
Pages (from-to)
832-835
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Globalisation in planning was put on the scientific research agenda by inspiring publications by Castells and Sassen. Since then research on the influences of globalisation on cities and urban and spatial policy has become more widespread. The concept of globalisation is often under discussion and the editors of Planning in a Global Era endorse this. The definition that they use as their basis is that of Held and colleagues (1999): “widening, deepening and speeding up of world wide connectedness in all aspects of social life”. This book consists of a wide range of contributions that were originally presentations at the Planning Research 2000 Conference at the London School of Economics. As in many books that have been put together in similar circumstances, widely differing papers are forced into juxtaposition between the same covers. The introduction the editors have given to the 17 contributions that follow is rather brief, even though they do have the intention of developing a common theoretical framework. Unfortunately, they have even neglected to put forward an adequate credible co‐ordinating framework within which the 17 contributions could each be given a logical place. [...]

Files

Book_reviews.pdf
(pdf | 0.311 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 31-03-2005
License info not available