Personalizing Treatment for Intensive Care Unit Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Comparing the S-, T-, and X-learner to Estimate the Conditional Average Treatment Effect for High versus Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanical Ventilation

Bachelor Thesis (2024)
Author(s)

J.B. Schnitzler (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

R.K.A. Karlsson – Mentor (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

J.M. Smit – Mentor (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

J.H. Krijthe – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Jasmijn A. Baaijens – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Graduation Date
23-06-2024
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
CSE3000 Research Project
Programme
Computer Science and Engineering
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is a vital supportive measure for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the intensive care unit. An important setting in the ventilator is the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which can reduce lung stress but may also cause harmful side effects. This research investigates the personalization of PEEP settings based on patient characteristics using three meta-learning algorithms (S-, T-, and X-learner) to estimate the conditional average treatment effect. Additionally, the hypothesis that the X-learner performs particularly well under a significant imbalance in patient numbers between treatment groups is tested. Results show that the X-learner slightly outperforms the S- and T-learners in terms of mean squared error under various unbalanced conditions in simulated data. However, the overall ability of these meta-learners to identify patients benefiting from high PEEP remains inconclusive. When using gradient boosted trees or random forest as base models, cumulative gain curves on MIMIC-IV data indicate potential overfitting. While the X-learner performs somewhat better on this data, the low area under the curve scores suggests a minimal distinction between high and low PEEP groups. External validation with data from a randomized control confirms that the models do not effectively distinguish between treatment groups. These findings suggest that further investigation with more complex models and real-world data is needed to validate the potential of meta-learning algorithms in personalizing PEEP settings for ARDS patients.

Files

License info not available