How restoration engineering measures can enhance the ecological value of intertidal flats

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Lauren E. Wiesebron (Universiteit Utrecht, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research)

Chui H. Cheng (Wageningen University & Research)

P. Lodewijk M. de Vet (TU Delft - Coastal Engineering, Deltares)

Brenda Walles (Wageningen University & Research)

Susanne van Donk (Wageningen University & Research)

Jeroen van Dalen (NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research)

Wietse van de Lageweg (HZ University of Applied Sciences)

Tom Ysebaert (NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Wageningen University & Research)

Tjeerd J. Bouma (NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Universiteit Utrecht)

Research Group
Coastal Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14247 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Coastal Engineering
Journal title
Restoration Ecology
Issue number
8
Volume number
32
Article number
e14247
Downloads counter
289
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Restoration engineering measures, such as managed realignments or building groins, modify the environmental characteristics of coastal intertidal ecosystems. Creating physical modifications that are beneficial to an intertidal system's ecology necessitates an in-depth understanding of the relationships between the abiotic and biotic components of a given intertidal habitat. In this study, we evaluate how hydrodynamics and sediment characteristics drive the development of the benthic macrofauna community during the first 5 years following engineering measures to enhance benthic macrofauna diversity at three locations. The creation of low-energy habitats through groins (Knuitershoek and Baalhoek) and a managed realignment dike breach (Perkpolder) led to the accumulation of fine sediments in all three impact sites. Biomass of benthic macrofauna quickly increased between 2016 and 2020, with successional processes being more important in Perkpolder, where the habitat was started completely from scratch due to a managed realignment, than at Knuitershoek or Baalhoek, where habitat conditions were improved by adding groins. In addition, the density of benthos-eating birds, especially oystercatchers, increased at some of the modified sites. While a low-energy habitat may harbor more diverse assemblages of benthic macrofauna than a highly dynamic one, the extremely high silt content, which is typical for low-energy habitats, may slow benthic community development. The observed increase of biomass at our impact sites highlights the value of the interventions, while the delays in the response of the benthic macrofauna community emphasizes the need for extensive monitoring both in time and space and the identification of underlying abiotic–biotic mechanisms.