Conflicting values in the smart electricity grid a comprehensive overview

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

T. E. de Wildt (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

E. J.L. Chappin (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

G. van de Kaa (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

P. M. Herder (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

I. R. van de Poel (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Energy and Industry
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.005 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Related content
Research Group
Energy and Industry
Journal title
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume number
111
Pages (from-to)
184-196
Downloads counter
299
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper aims to anticipate social acceptance issues related to the deployment of the smart electricity grid by identifying underlying value conflicts. The smart electricity grid is a key enabler of the energy transition. Its successful deployment is however jeopardized by social acceptance issues, such as concerns related to privacy and fairness. Social acceptance issues may be explained by value conflicts, i.e. the impossibility for a technological or regulatory design to simultaneously satisfy multiple societal expectations. Due to unsatisfied expectations concerning values, social discontent may arise. This paper identifies five groups of value conflicts in the smart electricity grid: consumer values versus competitiveness, IT enabled systems versus data protection, fair spatial distributions of energy systems versus system performance, market performance versus local trading, and individual access versus economies of scale. This is important for policy-makers and industry to increase the chances that the technology gains acceptance. As resolving value conflicts requires resources, this paper suggests three factors to prioritize their resolution: severity of resulting acceptance issues, resolvability of conflicts, and the level of resources required. The analysis shows that particularly the socio-economic disparities caused by the deployment of the smart electricity grid are alarming. Affordable policies are currently limited, but the impact in terms of social acceptance may be large.