Teaching history for design at TU Delft

exploring types of student learning and perceived relevance of history for the architecture profession

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

C.M. Hein (TU Delft - History, Form & Aesthetics)

Elise van Dooren (TU Delft - Architectural Engineering)

Research Group
History, Form & Aesthetics
Copyright
© 2019 C.M. Hein, E.J.G.C. van Dooren
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09533-5
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 C.M. Hein, E.J.G.C. van Dooren
Research Group
History, Form & Aesthetics
Issue number
5
Volume number
30 (2020)
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Historical investigation anchors architectural and urban practice. Analyzing two sets of questionnaires distributed in different class settings, this paper explores two questions: how do design students currently learn about architectural history, and how do they translate this knowledge into their design practice? First, tentative conclusions are that (1) physical engagement with buildings outside the classroom is an important inspiration for the students, (2) (assigned) books definitely influence their (design) thinking, (3) different types of pedagogy–lecture, seminar, thesis, studio–affect student learning in different and complementary ways, and (4) students overwhelmingly see history as a relevant preparation and foundation for design, but this understanding is implicit and often unspecific.