Validation of cardiac diffusion tensor imaging sequences

A multicentre test–retest phantom study

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Irvin Teh (University of Leeds)

William A. Romero R. (INSA Lyon)

Jordan Boyle (University of Leeds)

Jaume Coll-Font (Massachusetts General Hospital)

Erica Dall'Armellina (University of Leeds)

Daniel B. Ennis (VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University School of Medicine)

Pedro F. Ferreira (The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, National Heart and Lung Institute)

Prateek Kalra (The Ohio State University)

Arunark Kolipaka (The Ohio State University)

undefined More Authors (External organisation)

Affiliation
External organisation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4685 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Affiliation
External organisation
Journal title
NMR in Biomedicine
Issue number
6
Volume number
35
Article number
e4685
Downloads counter
251

Abstract

Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an emerging technique for the in vivo characterisation of myocardial microstructure, and there is a growing need for its validation and standardisation. We sought to establish the accuracy, precision, repeatability and reproducibility of state-of-the-art pulse sequences for cardiac DTI among 10 centres internationally. Phantoms comprising 0%–20% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) were scanned with DTI using a product pulsed gradient spin echo (PGSE; N = 10 sites) sequence, and a custom motion-compensated spin echo (SE; N = 5) or stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM; N = 5) sequence suitable for cardiac DTI in vivo. A second identical scan was performed 1–9 days later, and the data were analysed centrally. The average mean diffusivities (MDs) in 0% PVP were (1.124, 1.130, 1.113) x 10−3 mm2/s for PGSE, SE and STEAM, respectively, and accurate to within 1.5% of reference data from the literature. The coefficients of variation in MDs across sites were 2.6%, 3.1% and 2.1% for PGSE, SE and STEAM, respectively, and were similar to previous studies using only PGSE. Reproducibility in MD was excellent, with mean differences in PGSE, SE and STEAM of (0.3 ± 2.3, 0.24 ± 0.95, 0.52 ± 0.58) x 10−5 mm2/s (mean ± 1.96 SD). We show that custom sequences for cardiac DTI provide accurate, precise, repeatable and reproducible measurements. Further work in anisotropic and/or deforming phantoms is warranted.