Understanding Perceptions of Cycling Infrastructure Provision and its Role in Cycling Equity

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Danial Jahanshahi (The University of Auckland)

Seosamh B. B. Costello (The University of Auckland)

Kim Dirks (The University of Auckland)

Subeh Chowdhury (The University of Auckland)

Bert van Wee (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

Research Group
Transport and Logistics
Copyright
© 2023 Danial Jahanshahi, Seósamh B. Costello, Kim Natasha Dirks, Subeh Chowdhury, G.P. van Wee
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221117821
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Danial Jahanshahi, Seósamh B. Costello, Kim Natasha Dirks, Subeh Chowdhury, G.P. van Wee
Research Group
Transport and Logistics
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Issue number
3
Volume number
2677
Pages (from-to)
820-835
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Ensuring equity is considered in all types of decision making, including with respect to cycling provision, is important. Studies have investigated equity in relation to provision of cycling infrastructure and facilities. However, identifying other factors that need consideration in cycling equity is important. This study explored the impact of cycling infrastructure provision on individual perceptions of cycling infrastructure in relation to sociodemographic characteristics in Auckland, New Zealand. The results indicated that bicycle lane availability did not significantly influence perceptions of cycling infrastructure; however, ethnicity and whether a person was a regular cyclist did. Among noncyclists and potential cyclists, ethnicity was the only factor found to significantly influence perceptions of cycling infrastructure. Maori, the indigenous people of New Zealand, and Pacific Islanders rated the provision of cycling infrastructure higher than others for the same level of bicycle infrastructure in their community. Whereas Maori had the highest percentage of potential cyclists among all ethnicities, Pacific Islanders had the highest percentage of noncyclists (64.9%), the lowest percentage of potential cyclists, and one of the lowest percentages of regular cyclists. The study showed that cycling provision perceptions were more affected by factors like ethnicity, education, and bicycle user type than objective measures of bicycle infrastructure. Following the capabilities approach of justice, this study suggests that equitable provision of cycling infrastructure may not lead to an equitable cycling environment. To achieve this, interpersonal and intrapersonal indicators such as ethnicity and community-related factors must also be considered to encourage and empower all population groups to cycle.

Files

03611981221117821.pdf
(pdf | 1.97 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 26-02-2023
License info not available