Stochastic parametric LCA of GHG footprints of hyperloop systems

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Jianxiang Ma (ETH Zürich)

Jianpeng Cao (TU Delft - Design & Construction Management, The University of Hong Kong)

Lorenzo Benedetti (EuroTube Foundation)

Zienab Elghoul (EuroTube Foundation)

Guillaume Habert (ETH Zürich)

Research Group
Design & Construction Management
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110561 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Design & Construction Management
Journal title
Results in Engineering
Volume number
30
Article number
110561
Downloads counter
13
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Hyperloop systems offer high-speed, low-emission transport, yet existing life-cycle assessments (LCA) report inconsistent greenhouse gas (GHG) results because of differing system boundaries and assumptions. This study introduces a stochastic parametric LCA framework that quantifies both expected GHG emissions and associated uncertainties across four hyperloop configurations. A unified variance-decomposition model captures uncertainty arising from both design-type decisions and cross-design parameters, and maps these to stakeholder groups. Applied to a Zurich–Geneva case study, results show that tube material has the greatest impact on mean emissions, while component service life is the largest single source of uncertainty and operational parameters collectively contribute the second-largest share. Among stakeholders, operators have the greatest influence on GHG footprint by controlling most of the operational parameters and affecting component lifespans through maintenance. Infrastructure designers show the second greatest influence, primarily via their decision between using concrete or steel tubes. Pod designers rank third by determining the levitation technology and pod design characteristics, while constructors have the least influence, with their most impactful decision being the selection of material suppliers. This decision-centric framework enables transparent evaluation of carbon impacts and uncertainty and supports sustainable infrastructure planning for next-generation transport systems.