Swanton, Christine. The Virtue Ethics of Hume Nietzsche

Review (2016)
Author(s)

Mark Alfano (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Issue number
4
Volume number
126
Pages (from-to)
1120-1124
Downloads counter
234
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This book has a noble aim: to free virtue ethics from the grip of the neo-Aristotelianism that limits its scope in contemporary Anglophone philosophy. Just as there are deontological views that are not Kant’s or even Kantian, just as there are consequentialist views that are not Bentham’s or even utilitarian, so, Swanton contends, there are viable virtue ethical views that are not Aristotle’s or even Aristotelian. Indeed, the history of both Eastern and Western philosophy suggests that the majority of normative ethics has focused primarily on understanding and explaining the nature and development of virtue and vice. There are other alternatives to Aristotle (Mengzi springs to mind), but it’s not unreasonable to start with Hume and Nietzsche, as has already been demonstrated for by Erin Frykholm (“A Humean Particularist Virtue Ethic,” Philosophical Studies, 172(8) [2015]: 2171-91) and myself (Mark Alfano, “The Most Agreeable of All Vices,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21(4) [2013]: 767-90).

Files

ALFSCT.2.pdf
(pdf | 0.133 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-07-2017
License info not available