Magnetic properties of structural steels for simulation of crack monitoring by finite element method

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

M.P. van der Horst (University of Houston, TU Delft - Ship Hydromechanics and Structures)

ML Kaminski (TU Delft - Ship Hydromechanics and Structures)

Research Group
Ship Hydromechanics and Structures
Copyright
© 2020 M.P. van der Horst, M.L. Kaminski
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-019-0644-z
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 M.P. van der Horst, M.L. Kaminski
Research Group
Ship Hydromechanics and Structures
Issue number
1
Volume number
39
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The metal magnetic memory method is a novel technique for monitoring fatigue cracks in steel structures, which can reduce operational expenses and increase safety by minimizing inspections. The crack geometry can be identified by measuring the self magnetic flux leakage, which is induced by the Earth’s magnetic field and the permanent magnetization. The finite element method can be used to simulate the induced magnetic field around cracks to help interpret the self magnetic flux leakage measurements, but it is unclear what material properties to use. This study aims to determine the magnetic permeability of structural steel for accurate simulation of the induced magnetic field around cracks by the finite element method. The induced magnetic field was extracted from measurements above two square steel plates, one without defect and one with a straight slit, and compared with finite element results in function of the relative permeability. For both plates, a uniform relative permeability could be found for which experimental and numerical results were in good agreement. For the plate without defect and a relative permeability of 350, errors were within 20% and were concentrated around the plate’s edges. For the plate with the slit and a relative permeability of 225, errors were within 5%.