A global analysis of how human infrastructure squeezes sandy coasts

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Eva M. Lansu (NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, University Medical Center Groningen)

Valérie C. Reijers (Universiteit Utrecht)

Solveig Höfer (NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, University Medical Center Groningen)

Arjen Luijendijk (TU Delft - Coastal Engineering, Deltares)

Max Rietkerk (Universiteit Utrecht)

Martin J. Wassen (Universiteit Utrecht)

Evert Jan Lammerts (Staatsbosbeheer)

Tjisse van der Heide (NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, University Medical Center Groningen)

Research Group
Coastal Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44659-0
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Coastal Engineering
Journal title
Nature Communications
Issue number
1
Volume number
15
Article number
432
Downloads counter
351
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Coastal ecosystems provide vital services, but human disturbance causes massive losses. Remaining ecosystems are squeezed between rising seas and human infrastructure development. While shoreline retreat is intensively studied, coastal congestion through infrastructure remains unquantified. Here we analyse 235,469 transects worldwide to show that infrastructure occurs at a median distance of 392 meter from sandy shorelines. Moreover, we find that 33% of sandy shores harbour less than 100 m of infrastructure-free space, and that 23–30% of this space may be lost by 2100 due to rising sea levels. Further analyses show that population density and gross domestic product explain 35–39% of observed squeeze variation, emphasizing the intensifying pressure imposed as countries develop and populations grow. Encouragingly, we find that nature reserves relieve squeezing by 4–7 times. Yet, at present only 16% of world’s sandy shores have a protected status. We therefore advocate the incorporation of nature protection into spatial planning policies.