Scoring system for technical evaluation of technologies for remote monitoring of bridges

Conference Paper (2024)
Author(s)

Mogens Saberi (COWI A/S)

Kevin McPherson (Transport Research Laboratory)

Fengqiao Zhang (TU Delft - Concrete Structures)

Anna Arvidsson (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute)

Simon Fjendbo (Danish Technological Institute)

Carl Van Geem (Belgian Road Research Centre)

Maja Kreslin (Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute)

Andrej Anzlin (Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute)

Research Group
Concrete Structures
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003483755-358
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Concrete Structures
Pages (from-to)
3019-3026
ISBN (print)
9781032770406
ISBN (electronic)
9781003483755
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Transportation infrastructure demands reliable, cost-effective, environmentally friendly, and safe solutions. It is, therefore, crucial to leverage both the knowledge gained from current practices and the potential offered by emerging technologies. This paper uses the scoring system approached in the INFRACOMS project to offer a framework for asset managers and technology providers to identify areas of improvement and make informed decisions regarding selecting and implementing remote condition monitoring solutions. We focus on two technologies for bridges, like bridge weigh-in-motion and digital inspection and centre around four areas: data analysis, visualisation and integration and potential for practical decision-making. Technologies are evaluated based on their intended use, acknowledging that some may have multiple applications due to novel sensor installations or data interpretation/visualisation methods. Consequently, a technology may undergo multiple appraisals within this system. We showcase the benefits of the scoring system, alignment with specific use cases, and potential for broad applicability.