Exploring Schedule Risks in Large Airport Operational Readiness

Risk Identification and the Systematic Model

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Yutong Xue (Tongji University)

Yun Le (Tongji University)

X. Zhang (TU Delft - Design & Construction Management, Tongji University)

Kaiwen Jiang (Tongji University)

Research Group
Design & Construction Management
Copyright
© 2023 Yutong Xue, Yun Le, X. Zhang, Kaiwen Jiang
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13697
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Yutong Xue, Yun Le, X. Zhang, Kaiwen Jiang
Research Group
Design & Construction Management
Bibliographical Note
reen Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Issue number
12
Volume number
149
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Large airport operational readiness (LAOR) is a critical factor that directly impacts the opening of airports to the public. However, limited research exists on the risks affecting LAOR schedules. This article explores the risk breakdown structure and risk interactions model of LAOR schedule risk. An empirical investigation was conducted on four large hub airports from 2009 to 2021 using grounded theory procedures. The study identified 21 risk factors categorized into management (highest frequency), technical, process, participant, and environmental risks (lowest frequency), which implied that risks primarily existed within a project rather than in the external environment. A systematic model incorporating risks and their interactions revealed that the primary risk transfer path was from the subject subsystem (participant risk) to the object subsystem (technical and process risk). The findings expand the knowledge domain of infrastructure risk and provide pragmatic risk evaluation and response guidelines.

Files

Xue_et_al_2023_exploring_sched... (pdf)
(pdf | 1.32 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 25-03-2024
License info not available