Equipment for essential surgical care in 9 countries across Africa

availability, barriers and need for novel design

Journal Article (2018)
Authors

Roos M. Oosting (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Linda S.G.L. Wauben (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences)

R. S. Groen (Johns Hopkins University)

J. Dankelman (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Copyright
© 2018 R.M. Oosting, L.S.G.L. Wauben, R.S. Groen, J. Dankelman
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-018-0275-x
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 R.M. Oosting, L.S.G.L. Wauben, R.S. Groen, J. Dankelman
Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Issue number
3
Volume number
9 (2019)
Pages (from-to)
269-275
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-018-0275-x
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Shortages of medical equipment in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs) have been found by several previous studies that assessed surgical capacity. To increase surgical capacity, there is a need to identify the availability of specific types of surgical equipment on a local, regional and national level. A survey was conducted among surgeons attending the annual meeting of the College Of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) in December 2016. General information of the facilities, availability of surgical equipment, reasons for limited availability, daily usage of equipment and equipment that could benefit from redesign were assessed. Forty-two respondents participated in this study, representing 33 individual healthcare facilities (14 public referrals, 9 public district and 10 private (for-profit and non-profit)). The respondents worked in 9 countries in East, Central, Western and Southern Africa. A deficiency in availability of basic surgical equipment was found, especially in public district hospitals. Electrosurgical units, endoscopes, defibrillators, infusions pumps and electrocardiogram monitors were of limited availability. Reasons indicated for this limited availability were: no need, too costly, no training, no disposables and no repair. Lack of maintenance and old/overused equipment were identified as major reasons for failure of equipment. Equipment that could benefit from redesign were for example: electrosurgical units, laparoscopic equipment and theatre lights. Availability of surgical equipment should be increased, especially in public district hospitals. Novel context appropriate redesign that is adapted to fit the context in LMICs could decrease the barriers to availability and to failure of surgical equipment.