Receding-horizon control for max-plus linear systems with discrete actions using optimistic planning

Conference Paper (2016)
Author(s)

Jia Xu (TU Delft - Team Bart De Schutter)

L Busoniu (Technical University of Cluj-Napoca)

Ton van den van den Boom (TU Delft - Team Bart De Schutter)

Bart De Schutter (TU Delft - Team Bart De Schutter)

Research Group
Team Bart De Schutter
Copyright
© 2016 J. Xu, L Busoniu, A.J.J. van den Boom, B.H.K. De Schutter
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/WODES.2016.7497879
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 J. Xu, L Busoniu, A.J.J. van den Boom, B.H.K. De Schutter
Research Group
Team Bart De Schutter
Pages (from-to)
398-403
ISBN (print)
978-1-5090-4190-0
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper addresses the infinite-horizon optimal control problem for max-plus linear systems where the considered objective function is a sum of discounted stage costs over an infinite horizon. The minimization problem of the cost function is equivalently transformed into a maximization problem of a reward function. The resulting optimal control problem is solved based on an optimistic planning algorithm. The control variables are the increments of system inputs and the action space is discretized as a finite set. Given a finite computational budget, a control sequence is returned by the optimistic planning algorithm. The first control action or a subsequence of the returned control sequence is applied to the system and then a receding-horizon scheme is adopted. The proposed optimistic planning approach allows us to limit the computational budget and also yields a characterization of the level of near-optimality of the resulting solution. The effectiveness of the approach is illustrated with a numerical example. The results show that the optimistic planning approach results in a lower tracking error compared with a finite-horizon approach when a subsequence of the returned control sequence is applied.

Files

WODES16_0096_FI.pdf
(pdf | 0.274 Mb)
License info not available