Mapping Social Media Dependency

Functional and Psychological Platform Reliance as Mechanisms of Digital Vulnerability

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Janneke M. Schokkenbroek (Hogeschool Inholland, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universiteit Gent, TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Maria Lucia Rebrean (Universiteit Leiden)

Constanta Rosca (Universiteit Leiden)

Maëlle Picout (Universiteit Leiden)

Gianclaudio Malgieri (Universiteit Leiden)

Ben Wagner (University Austria, Hogeschool Inholland, TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Lorena Sánchez Chamorro (University of Twente)

Research Group
Organisation & Governance
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791806 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Article number
624
Publisher
ACM
ISBN (electronic)
9798400722783
Event
2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2026 (2026-04-13 - 2026-04-17), Barcelona, Spain
Downloads counter
12
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Social media dependency is a central mechanism through which digital vulnerability takes shape, making it critical to understand for research, design, and policy. This study distinguishes between functional dependency (needs-based reliance) and psychological dependency (compulsive engagement) and investigates how these dimensions intersect. We surveyed 873 adult users across Europe, measuring both dependency forms alongside demographics, well-being, motivations, platform choice, and exposure to manipulative design features. Latent profile analysis and multinomial logistic regression revealed five distinct dependency profiles: functional use, low-dependency pragmatic use, high-dependency social use, moderate-dependency hedonic use, and very high-dependency multi-motivated use. These findings show dependency is not uniform but layered and dynamic, shifting with users' circumstances and socio-technical contexts. By situating dependency within both individual and design-related factors, the study advances theoretical debates on digital vulnerability and offers a profiles-based lens that helps inform the design of more autonomy-supportive social media platforms.