Assessment of technical skills based on learning curve analyses in laparoscopic surgery training

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

S.F. Hardon (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology, Amsterdam UMC)

Leonie A. van Gastel (Amsterdam UMC)

T. Horeman (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Freek Daams (Amsterdam UMC)

Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Copyright
© 2021 S.F. Hardon, Leonie A. van Gastel, T. Horeman, Freek Daams
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.024
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 S.F. Hardon, Leonie A. van Gastel, T. Horeman, Freek Daams
Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Issue number
3
Volume number
170
Pages (from-to)
831-840
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Objective force- and motion-based assessment is currently lacking in laparoscopic skills curricula. This study aimed to evaluate the added value of parameter-based assessment and feedback during training. Methods: Laparoscopy-naïve surgical residents that took part in a 3-week skills training curriculum were included. A box trainer equipped with the ForceSense system was used for assessment of tissue manipulation- (MaxForce) and instrument-handling skills (Path length and Time). Learning curves were established using linear regression tests. Pre- and post-course comparisons indicated the overall progression and were compared to predefined proficiency levels. A post-course survey was carried out to assess face validity. Results: In total, 4,268 trials, executed by 24 residents, were successfully assessed. Median (interquartile range) MaxForce outcomes improved from 2.7 Newton (interquartile range 1.9–3.8) to 1.8 Newton (interquartile range 1.2–2.4) between pre- and post-course assessment (P ≤ .009). Instrument Path length improved from 7,102.2 mm (interquartile range 5,255.2–9,025.9) to 3,545.3 mm (interquartile range 2,842.9–4,563.2) (P ≤.001). Time to execute the task improved from 159.8 seconds (interquartile range 119.8–219.0) to 60.7 seconds (interquartile range 46.0–79.5) (P ≤ .001). The learning curves revealed during what training phase the proficiency benchmarks were reached for each trainee. In the survey outcomes, trainees indicated that this curriculum should be part of a surgical residency program (mean visual analog scale score of 9.2 ± 0.9 standard deviation). Conclusion: Force-, motion-, and time-parameters can be objectively measured during basic laparoscopic skills curricula and do indicate progression of skills over time. The ForceSense parameters enable curricula to be designed for specific proficiency-based training goals and offer the possibility for objective classification of the levels of expertise.