Urban housing markets under flood risk

Modeling demand pressure, risk perception bias, and public interventions

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Asli Mutlu (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management, TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Tatiana Filatova (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management, TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Policy Analysis
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2026.102440 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Policy Analysis
Journal title
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
Volume number
128
Article number
102440
Downloads counter
19
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Urban housing markets increasingly face escalating flood risk alongside persistent scarcity and affordability constraints. While these pressures shape price dynamics, their effects depend critically on heterogeneity in household risk perceptions and preferences. This study develops a spatial agent-based model (ABM) to examine how price differentials and residential patterns emerge from bottom-up interactions in a flood-prone urban environment. Parameterised to represent a typical city in the Netherlands, the model conducts scenario experiments that vary (i) market demand pressure, (ii) spatially heterogeneous individual risk perception biases, and (iii) public flood defense systems, including traditional defenses and nature-based flood defenses with co-benefits. Results show that market pressure and biased risk perceptions are the primary drivers of price growth and income-based exclusion, emerging well before flood defenses are introduced. Traditional flood defenses narrow flood-related price discounts by reducing objective risk, with nature-based defenses further reinforcing existing patterns through amenity capitalization. In both cases, public flood protection mainly reallocate demand spatially without altering overall market participation or affordability.