Unobtrusive yet Precise Velocity Perturbations During Voluntary Elbow Movement for Reliable Joint Dynamics Assessment

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Jonathan C. Van Zanten (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Karien Ter Welle (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Mark Van De Ruit (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Erwin E.H. Van Wegen (Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC)

Carel G.M. Meskers (Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences)

Alfred C. Schouten (TU Delft - Biomechanical Engineering)

Winfred Mugge (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Arno H.A. Stienen (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2026.3672270
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Volume number
34
Pages (from-to)
1480-1487
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Robotic systems assess joint dynamics objectively by perturbing the limb and estimating properties such as impedance. Position perturbations constrain the limb to a target trajectory, reducing variability in task execution but obstructing voluntary motion. Force perturbations allow voluntary movement but elicit orientation-dependent responses, increasing the number of trials needed for accurate estimates. To overcome these limitations, we combined the flexibility of admittance control with the repeatability of position perturbations. A minimum-jerk trajectory ensures smooth transitions. The experiment with six healthy participants was performed to demonstrate the reliability, accuracy and smoothness of applying such perturbations during voluntary movement. Reliability was the proportion of perturbations that reached the target velocity within one millisecond of the acceleration time window. Accuracy was measured as the RMSE between the target and measured velocity during the constant velocity. Smoothness was assessed as perceivability: the fraction of trials in which participants correctly detected a perturbation. The controller allows continuous voluntary movement, switching only during perturbations to impose a precise, specified perturbation. All perturbations reached the target velocity within one millisecond of the acceleration time window; thus, the method is reliable. Under the most demanding condition— an increase to 200 deg/s in 0.01 s—the RMSE between target and measured velocity was 1.1 deg/s (0.55%), indicating a high accuracy. Specially designed perturbations had a perceivability accuracy of 22.1%, indicating smooth transitions between control modes. Together, these results indicate a promising approach for assessing joint dynamics during voluntary elbow movement, enabling assessment during activities of daily living.