Automatic generation of three-dimensional dose reconstruction data for two-dimensional radiotherapy plans for historically treated patients

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Ziyuan Wang (Amsterdam UMC, Universiteit van Amsterdam, TU Delft - Applied Sciences)

Marco Virgolin (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI))

Peter A.N. Bosman (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI))

Koen F. Crama (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Brian V. Balgobind (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Arjan Bel (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Tanja Alderliesten (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC)

Research Group
Algorithmics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.1.015001 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
Algorithmics
Issue number
1
Volume number
7
Article number
015001
Downloads counter
209

Abstract

Performing large-scale three-dimensional radiation dose reconstruction for patients requires a large amount of manual work. We present an image processing-based pipeline to automatically reconstruct radiation dose. The pipeline was designed for childhood cancer survivors that received abdominal radiotherapy with anterior-to-posterior and posterior-to-anterior field set-up. First, anatomical landmarks are automatically identified on two-dimensional radiographs. Second, these landmarks are used to derive parameters to emulate the geometry of the plan on a surrogate computed tomography. Finally, the plan is emulated and used as input for dose calculation. For qualitative evaluation, 100 cases of automatic and manual plan emulations were assessed by two experienced radiation dosimetrists in a blinded comparison. The two radiation dosimetrists approved 100%/100% and 92%/91% of the automatic/manual plan emulations, respectively. Similar approval rates of 100% and 94% hold when the automatic pipeline is applied on another 50 cases. Further, quantitative comparisons resulted in on average <5 mm difference in plan isocenter/borders, and <0.9 Gy in organ mean dose (prescribed dose: 14.4 Gy) calculated from the automatic and manual plan emulations. No statistically significant difference in terms of dose reconstruction accuracy was found for most organs at risk. Ultimately, our automatic pipeline results are of sufficient quality to enable effortless scaling of dose reconstruction data generation.