A Study of Global-Coefficient Non-Linear Eddy Viscosity Models

Master Thesis (2018)
Author(s)

M.F. Döpke (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Contributor(s)

R. P. Dwight – Mentor

Martin Schmelzer – Mentor

Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
Copyright
© 2018 Max Döpke
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 Max Döpke
Graduation Date
29-03-2018
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Aerospace Engineering | Aerodynamics and Wind Energy
Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In this research a global-coefficient non-linear eddy viscosity model (NLEVM) is studied. This model stems from the inherent inability of the Boussinesq approximation to model anisotropy and therefore flow features such as: swirl, stream-line curvature and secondary motions (Lumley, 1970; Pope, 1975; Craft et al., 1996). The focus lies on the limitations of using global-coefficients calibrated on a square-duct flow when applied on a rectangular-duct and a wing-body junction. The calibration is done with the Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) results from Pinelli et al. (2010) at a Reynolds number of Re = 1, 100. It is shown that using a global-coefficient NLEVM the velocity prediction on a square-duct and rectangular-duct is successfully corrected, i.e. secondary motions are present. On an attempt to improve the corner flow separation on a wing-body junction poor performance is observed. Stability issues led to only 3 models converge out of 21. Differently to Bordji et al. (2014) who found a large corner flow separation reduction with a Spalart-Allmaras Quadratic Constitutive Relation (SA-QCR) turbulence model when compared to a standard SA model, the global-coefficient NLEVM only showed limited corner flow separation reduction. Apart from correcting the anisotropy the near-wall resolution and treatment is found to be of large importance for flow field predictions. In the square- and rectangular-duct a wall damping function destroyed the secondary motion prediction, whilst in the wing-body junction improving the junction and corner flow prediction.

Files

FinalMScThesis.pdf
(pdf | 28.2 Mb)
License info not available