Repentance as Rebuke

Betrayal and Moral Injury in Safety Engineering

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Sydney W.A. Dekker (TU Delft - Control & Simulation, Griffith University)

Mark D. Layson (Charles Sturt University)

David D. Woods (The Ohio State University)

Research Group
Control & Simulation
Copyright
© 2022 S.W.A. Dekker, Mark D. Layson, David D. Woods
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00412-2
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 S.W.A. Dekker, Mark D. Layson, David D. Woods
Research Group
Control & Simulation
Issue number
6
Volume number
28
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Following other contributions about the MAX accidents to this journal, this paper explores the role of betrayal and moral injury in safety engineering related to the U.S. federal regulator’s role in approving the Boeing 737MAX—a plane involved in two crashes that together killed 346 people. It discusses the tension between humility and hubris when engineers are faced with complex systems that create ambiguity, uncertain judgements, and equivocal test results from unstructured situations. It considers the relationship between moral injury, principled outrage and rebuke when the technology ends up involved in disasters. It examines the corporate backdrop against which calls for enhanced employee voice are typically made, and argues that when engineers need to rely on various protections and moral inducements to ‘speak up,’ then the ethical essence of engineering—skepticism, testing, checking, and questioning—has already failed.

Files

S11948_022_00412_2.pdf
(pdf | 0.648 Mb)
License info not available