The effect of haptic support systems on driver performance: A literature survey

Journal Article (2015)
Author(s)

S.M. Petermeijer (Technische Universität München)

David Abbink (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Mark Mulder (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Joost C.F. De Winter (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2015 SM Petermeijer, D.A. Abbink, M. Mulder, J.C.F. de Winter
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2015.2437871
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2015
Language
English
Copyright
© 2015 SM Petermeijer, D.A. Abbink, M. Mulder, J.C.F. de Winter
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Issue number
4
Volume number
8
Pages (from-to)
467-479
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

A large number of haptic driver support systems have been described in the scientific literature. However, there is little consensus regarding the design, evaluation methods, and effectiveness of these systems. This literature survey aimed to investigate: (1) what haptic systems (in terms of function, haptic signal, channel, and supported task) have been experimentally tested, (2) how these haptic systems have been evaluated, and (3) their reported effects on driver performance and behaviour. We reviewed empirical research in which participants had to drive a vehicle in a real or simulated environment, were able to control the heading and/or speed of the vehicle, and a haptic signal was provided to them. The results indicated that a clear distinction can be made between warning systems (using vibrations) and guidance systems (using continuous forces). Studies typically used reaction time measures for evaluating warning systems and vehicle-centred performance measures for evaluating guidance systems. In general, haptic warning systems reduced the reaction time of a driver compared to no warnings, although these systems may cause annoyance. Guidance systems generally improved the performance of drivers compared to non-aided driving, but these systems may suffer from after-effects. Longitudinal research is needed to investigate the transfer and retention of effects caused by haptic support systems.

Files

07113879.pdf
(pdf | 1.5 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-12-2015
License info not available