“Why were you speeding?”

A self-confrontation study on awareness and reasons for speed behaviour

Journal Article (2025)
Authors

Angèle Picco (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)

Arjan Stuiver (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)

Joost C.F. de Winter (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Dick De Waard (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)

Research Group
Human-Robot Interaction
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.015
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Human-Robot Interaction
Volume number
109
Pages (from-to)
421-438
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.015
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Despite extensive prevention, speeding remains a major contributor to traffic casualties. Understanding drivers’ perceived awareness and the subjective reasons for their speed behaviour could improve intervention strategies, and specifically inform the potential of speed feedback. A self-confrontation study was conducted in which 25 regular drivers recorded one of their drives using GoPro cameras, capturing both the road view and their speed, and selected video excerpts were later discussed with these participants. The study explored participants’ awareness and reasons for their speed behaviour, as well as general attitudes towards speeding, perceptions of its problematic nature, the acceptability of exceeding speed limits, and decision-making in speed choice. This study design aimed to provide an objective basis for the interviews and reduce recall biases. The results revealed that drivers show a latent awareness of their speeding behaviour, which they most often justified as usual, normal and safe. This general tolerance towards speeding suggests the normalisation of speed violations. As a result, individual safety interventions, such as feedback on driving behaviour, may not be effective. Prevention efforts should focus on changing norms, common beliefs and systemic factors regarding speeding.