Haptic lane-keeping assistance for truck driving

A test track study

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Jeroen Roozendaal (Student TU Delft)

Emma Johansson (Volvo)

J.C.F. Winter (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

DA Abbink (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Sebastiaan Petermeijer (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Research Group
Human-Robot Interaction
Copyright
© 2020 Jeroen Roozendaal, Emma Johansson, J.C.F. de Winter, D.A. Abbink, S.M. Petermeijer
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820928622
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Jeroen Roozendaal, Emma Johansson, J.C.F. de Winter, D.A. Abbink, S.M. Petermeijer
Research Group
Human-Robot Interaction
Issue number
8
Volume number
63 (2021)
Pages (from-to)
1380-1395
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and subjective acceptance of three designs for haptic lane-keeping assistance in truck driving. Background: Haptic lane-keeping assistance provides steering torques toward a reference trajectory, either continuously or only when exceeding a bandwidth. These approaches have been previously investigated in driving simulators, but it is unclear how these generalize toward real-life truck driving. Method: Three haptic lane-keeping algorithms to assist truck drivers were evaluated on a 6.3-km-long oval-shaped test track: (1) a single-bandwidth (SB) algorithm, which activated assistance torques when the predicted lateral deviation from lane center exceeded 0.4 m; (2) a double-bandwidth (DB) algorithm, which activated as SB, but deactivated after returning within 0.15 m lateral deviation; and (3) an algorithm providing assistance torques continuously (Cont) toward the lane center. Fifteen participants drove four trials each, one trial without and one for each haptic assistance design. Furthermore, participants drove with and without a concurrent visually distracting task. Results: Compared to unsupported driving, all three assistance systems provided similar safety benefits in terms of decreased absolute lateral position and number of lane departures. Participants reported higher satisfaction and usability for Cont compared to SB. Conclusion: The continuous assistance was better accepted than bandwidth assistance, a finding consistent with prior driving simulator research. Research is still needed to investigate the long-term effects of haptic assistance on reliance and after-effects. Application: The present results are useful for designers of haptic lane-keeping assistance, as driver acceptance and performance are determinants of reliance and safety, respectively.