Deep Learning Based Automatic Ankle Tenosynovitis Quantification from MRI in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

A Feasibility Study

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Saeed Arbabi ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Vahid Arbabi ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Lorenzo Costa ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Iris ten Katen ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Simon C. Mastbergen ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Peter R. Seevinck (MRIguidance B.V, University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Pim A. de Jong ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Harrie Weinans (TU Delft - Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics, University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Mylène P. Jansen ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Wouter Foppen ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121469 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Journal title
Diagnostics
Issue number
12
Volume number
15
Article number
1469
Downloads counter
180
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Tenosynovitis is a common feature of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and is typically assessed using semi-quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring. However, visual scoring s variability. This study evaluates a fully automated, deep-learning approach for ankle tenosynovitis segmentation and volume-based quantification from MRI in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. Methods: We analyzed 364 ankle 3T MRI scans from 71 PsA patients. Four tenosynovitis pathologies were manually scored and used to create ground truth segmentations through a human–machine workflow. For each pathology, 30 annotated scans were used to train a deep-learning segmentation model based on the nnUNet framework, and 20 scans were used for testing, ensuring patient-level disjoint sets. Model performance was evaluated using Dice scores. Volumetric pathology measurements from test scans were compared to radiologist scores using Spearman correlation. Additionally, 218 serial MRI pairs were assessed to analyze the relationship between changes in pathology volume and changes in visual scores. Results: The segmentation model achieved promising performance on the test set, with mean Dice scores ranging from 0.84 to 0.92. Pathology volumes correlated with visual scores across all test MRIs (Spearman ρ = 0.52–0.62). Volume-based quantification captured changes in inflammation over time and identified subtle progression not reflected in semi-quantitative scores. Conclusions: Our automated segmentation tool enables fast and accurate quantification of ankle tenosynovitis in PsA patients. It may enhance sensitivity to disease progression and complement visual scoring through continuous, volume-based metrics.