Center of mass velocity-based predictions in balance recovery following pelvis perturbations during human walking

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

M. Vlutters (University of Twente)

EHF van Asseldonk (University of Twente)

Herman Van Der Kooij (University of Twente, TU Delft - OLD Biorobotics)

Research Group
OLD Biorobotics
Copyright
© 2016 M Vlutters, EHF van Asseldonk, H. van der Kooij
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.129338
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 M Vlutters, EHF van Asseldonk, H. van der Kooij
Research Group
OLD Biorobotics
Issue number
10
Volume number
219
Pages (from-to)
1514-1523
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In many simple walking models, foot placement dictates the center of pressure location and ground reaction force components, whereas humans can modulate these aspects after foot contact. Because of the differences, it is unclear to what extent predictions made by models are valid for human walking. Yet, both model simulations and human experimental data have previously indicated that the center of mass (COM) velocity plays an important role in regulating stable walking. Here, perturbed human walking was studied to determine the relationship of the horizontal COM velocity at heel strike and toe-off with the foot placement location relative to the COM, the forthcoming center of pressure location relative to the COM, and the ground reaction forces. Ten healthy subjects received mediolateral and anteroposterior pelvis perturbations of various magnitudes at toe-off, during 0.63 and 1.25 m s−1 treadmill walking. At heel strike after the perturbation, recovery from mediolateral perturbations involved mediolateral foot placement adjustments proportional to the mediolateral COM velocity. In contrast, for anteroposterior perturbations, no significant anteroposterior foot placement adjustment occurred at this heel strike. However, in both directions the COM velocity at heel strike related linearly to the center of pressure location at the subsequent toe-off. This relationship was affected by the walking speed and was, for the slow speed, in line with a COM velocity-based control strategy previously applied by others in a linear inverted pendulum model. Finally, changes in gait phase durations suggest that the timing of actions could play an important role during the perturbation recovery.

Files

1514.full.pdf
(pdf | 0.858 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 15-05-2017
License info not available