Dry port location selection for integration with inland waterway transport in developing countries: A case study in Northern Vietnam

Master Thesis (2024)
Author(s)

T.M.H. Nguyen (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Contributor(s)

J. Rezaei – Mentor (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

Arjan van Binsbergen – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Transport, Mobility and Logistics)

Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Graduation Date
28-08-2024
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Transport, Infrastructure and Logistics']
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Dry port has emerged as a critical element of transport infrastructure, eliciting substantial research and investment for its development. The strategic selection of dry port locations not only enhances the effectiveness of connections between seaports and hinterlands but also supports the sustainable advancement of the logistics industry, given that dry port operations can integrate with more environmentally friendly transportation modes, particularly inland waterway transport. Extensive research has been conducted to identify optimal dry port locations within the framework of inland waterway container terminals. Nevertheless, these studies primarily focus on developed economies, leaving a notable research void in developing countries. This paper aims to propose a methodological framework for selecting the most suitable dry port location, with a particular emphasis on integration with inland waterway transport in developing nations. This study implements a combination of the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realité III (ELECTRE III) in this domain. An analytical case study of Northern Vietnam, considering five alternative dry ports, is conducted to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework. Twenty-seven Vietnamese experts, categorized into three groups—policymakers and consultants, dry port investors and operators, and dry port users—participate in the decision-making process, contributing insights to this case study. An aggregated group decision-making approach is employed. Four principal criteria—economic, accessibility, location, and environmental—are utilized to assess and rank the five alternatives. The findings reveal that a reduction in transport cost is the most critical sub-criterion, while environmental considerations and railway accessibility receive the lowest priority.

Files

TIL_Thesis_-_Hoa_Nguyen.pdf
(pdf | 10.4 Mb)
License info not available