Scaling of piecewise deterministic Monte Carlo for anisotropic targets

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

G.N.J.C. Bierkens (TU Delft - Statistics)

Kengo Kamatani (Institute of Statistical Mathematics)

Gareth O. Roberts (University of Warwick)

Research Group
Statistics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3150/24-BEJ1807
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Statistics
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public. @en
Issue number
3
Volume number
31
Pages (from-to)
2323-2350
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Piecewise deterministic Markov processes (PDMPs) are a type of continuous-time Markov process that combine deterministic flows with jumps. Recently, PDMPs have garnered attention within the Monte Carlo community as a potential alternative to traditional Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. The Zig-Zag sampler and the Bouncy Particle Sampler are commonly used examples of the PDMP methodology which have also yielded impressive theoretical properties, but little is known about their robustness to extreme dependence or anisotropy of the target density. It turns out that PDMPs may suffer from poor mixing due to anisotropy and this paper investigates this effect in detail in the stylised but important Gaussian case. To this end, we employ a multi-scale analysis framework in this paper. Our results show that when the Gaussian target distribution has two scales, of order 1 and ɛ, the computational cost of the Bouncy Particle Sampler is of order ɛ−1, and the computational cost of the Zig-Zag sampler is ɛ−2 . In comparison, the cost of the traditional MCMC methods such as RWM is of order ɛ−2, at least when the dimensionality of the small component is more than 1. Therefore, there is a robustness advantage to using PDMPs in this context.

Files

BEJ1807.pdf
(pdf | 0.789 Mb)
License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 13-10-2025