Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options

Journal article (2009)

Authors

Marjolein de Best-Waldhober Universiteit Leiden
Dancker Daamen Universiteit Leiden
Andrea Ramirez Universiteit Utrecht
André Faaij Universiteit Utrecht
Affiliation
External organisation
Information Acceptance CCS Choice Public opinion ICQ Public perception
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

01-02-2009

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Affiliation

External organisation

Abstract

In this study, an Information-Choice Questionnaire (ICQ) was used to find out how a representative sample of the Dutch public (n =971) would evaluate and choose between seven mitigation options after having been thoroughly informed. The results suggest that due to the comparison with other mitigation options, people are less positive about CCS options. Still, only few respondents firmly reject the CCS options.