Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options

None, None; None, None; None, None; None, None; None, None; None, None

Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options

Journal Article (2009)

Author(s)

Marjolein de Best-Waldhober (Universiteit Leiden)

Dancker Daamen (Universiteit Leiden)

Andrea Ramirez Ramirez (Universiteit Utrecht)

André Faaij (Universiteit Utrecht)

Chris Hendriks (Ecofys)

Erika de Visser (Ecofys)

Affiliation

External organisation

DOI related publication

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.306

Information Acceptance CCS Choice Public opinion ICQ Public perception

To reference this document use:

https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:ebc31ab6-2b2e-4e93-b0db-771610e949d2

More Info

expand_more

Publication Year

2009

Language

English

Affiliation

External organisation

Issue number

1

Volume number

1

Pages (from-to)

4795-4802

Abstract

In this study, an Information-Choice Questionnaire (ICQ) was used to find out how a representative sample of the Dutch public (n =971) would evaluate and choose between seven mitigation options after having been thoroughly informed. The results suggest that due to the comparison with other mitigation options, people are less positive about CCS options. Still, only few respondents firmly reject the CCS options.

No files available

Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.