Cyclists’ eye movements and crossing judgments at uncontrolled intersections

An eye-tracking study using animated video clips

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

N Kovácsová (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

C.D.D. Cabrall (TU Delft - Intelligent Vehicles)

S.J. Antonisse (Student TU Delft)

T. De Haan (Student TU Delft)

R. van Namen (Student TU Delft)

J.L. Nooren (Student TU Delft)

R. Schreurs (Student TU Delft)

Marjan Hagenzieker (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

J.C.F. de Winter (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction, TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2018 N. Kovacsova, C.D.D. Cabrall, S.J. Antonisse, T. De Haan, R. van Namen, J.L. Nooren, R. Schreurs, Marjan Hagenzieker, J.C.F. de Winter
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.024
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 N. Kovacsova, C.D.D. Cabrall, S.J. Antonisse, T. De Haan, R. van Namen, J.L. Nooren, R. Schreurs, Marjan Hagenzieker, J.C.F. de Winter
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Volume number
120
Pages (from-to)
270-280
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Research indicates that crashes between a cyclist and a car often occur even when the cyclist must have seen the approaching car, suggesting the importance of hazard anticipation skills. This study aimed to analyze cyclists’ eye movements and crossing judgments while approaching an intersection at different speeds. Thirty-six participants watched animated video clips with a car approaching an uncontrolled four-way intersection and continuously indicated whether they would cross the intersection first. We varied (1) car approach scenario (passing, colliding, stopping), (2) traffic complexity (one or two approaching cars), and (3) cyclist’s approach speed (15, 25, or 35 km/h). Results showed that participants looked at the approaching car when it was relevant to the task of crossing the intersection and posed an imminent hazard, and they directed less attention to the car after it had stopped or passed the intersection. Traffic complexity resulted in divided attention between the two cars, but participants retained most visual attention to the car that came from the right and had right of way. Effects of cycling speed on cyclists’ gaze behavior and crossing judgments were small to moderate. In conclusion, cyclists’ visual focus and crossing judgments are governed by situational factors (i.e., objects with priority and future collision potential), whereas cycling speed does not have substantial effects on eye movements and crossing judgments.

Files

1_s2.0_S0001457518305062_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 2.15 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-03-2019
License info not available