Designing Decisions

How can Data Visualisation Influence Better Economic Decision-Making

Master Thesis (2024)
Author(s)

J.H.L. van den Berg (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Contributor(s)

E. Tempelman – Mentor (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

J.S. Broadhead – Mentor (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Arnd Schirrmann – Mentor (Airbus)

Faculty
Industrial Design Engineering
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Graduation Date
17-06-2024
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Integrated Product Design
Sponsors
Airbus , None
Faculty
Industrial Design Engineering
Downloads counter
269
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Decision-making in professional fields has made a stark transition away from utility as the comparative metric in neoclassical economic frameworks. The result of which means a step towards the use of non-equatable variables for calculating the comparability between material, energy, and fiscal costs. While the traditional methods have their flaws, new methods also have their shortcomings. Understanding the flaws within neoclassical utilitarian economic frameworks makes for better overall decision-making without the problems accompanying the use of only heterodox economic methods. This thesis investigates the extent to which it is possible to build a new neoclassically oriented economic tool that allows the user to better understand the pitfalls of simple neoclassical economic modelling. By studying existing economic tools and interviewing experts, a design study is conducted; setting up requirements, building, and testing the tool for feasibility. The results indicate that while this new web-based tool for cost-benefit analysis is more user-friendly than spreadsheet applications, it fails at its primary task of having users more easily intuit the shortcomings inherent within cost-benefit analyses.

Files

License info not available
License info not available