(In)efficacy of architected auxetic materials for impact mitigation

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Til Gärtner (TNO Den Haag, TU Delft - Applied Mechanics)

Richard Dekker (TNO Den Haag)

Dennis van Veen (TNO Den Haag)

Sanne J. van den Boom (TNO)

Lucas Amaral (TNO Den Haag)

Research Group
Applied Mechanics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105402
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Applied Mechanics
Volume number
206
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that auxetic materials, characterized by a negative Poisson's ratio, offer enhanced resistance to indentation, shear forces, fracture toughness and the absorption of energy. As such, they are reported in literature to be promising options for impact mitigation in military and space contexts. Auxetic materials are rare in nature, and must therefore be designed and manufactured artificially in order to be applied. Densification of auxetic materials in order to absorb impact energy in a limited area has been the focus in the literature to date. However, this results in a concentration of the force paths, which is not desirable for impact mitigation. In this work, the effects of auxetic densification on the stress distribution over the backside of the auxetic material are addressed using both experimental and simulative trials. In this study, the distinction between auxetic and conventional honeycombs in force transmission characteristics is examined. This is achieved through an analysis of experimental data and the utilization of numerical techniques to enhance comprehension of the internal mechanisms of architected materials in response to impact.