WEE1 inhibitors trigger GCN2-mediated activation of the integrated stress response

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Rinskje B. Tjeerdsma (University Medical Center Groningen)

Timothy F. Ng (Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine)

Maurits Roorda (University Medical Center Groningen)

Daniëlle Bianchi (Netherlands Cancer Institute)

Sora Yang ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Clara Bonnet (Mount Sinai Hospital)

Michael VanInsberghe ( University Medical Centre Utrecht)

Marieke Everts (University Medical Center Groningen)

Marvin E. Tanenbaum (Oncode Institute, Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, University Medical Centre Utrecht, TU Delft - Applied Sciences)

undefined More Authors (External organisation)

Research Group
BN/Marvin Tanenbaum Lab
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66514-0 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
BN/Marvin Tanenbaum Lab
Journal title
Nature Communications
Issue number
1
Volume number
16
Article number
11598
Downloads counter
32
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The WEE1 kinase negatively regulates CDK1/2 to control DNA replication and mitotic entry. Genetic factors that determine sensitivity to WEE1 inhibitors (WEE1i) are largely unknown. A genome-wide insertional mutagenesis screen revealed that mutation of EIF2A, a translation regulator, sensitized to WEE1i. Additionally, a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen revealed that inactivation of integrated stress response (ISR) kinase GCN2 or its co-factor GCN1 rescued WEE1i-mediated cytotoxicity. Conversely, loss of the collided ribosome sensor ZNF598 increased sensitivity to WEE1i. Mechanistically, WEE1i induced paradoxical GCN2 activation, ATF4 upregulation, and altered ribosome dynamics. ISR activation was independent of WEE1 presence, pointing at off-target GCN2 engagement by multiple chemically distinct WEE1i. ISR activation was observed in cancer cells as well as non-transformed cells, and required GCN1 and ongoing translation. Consequently, WEE1i induce multiple independent cellular effects: DNA damage, premature mitotic entry and sensitization to DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics in an ISR-independent fashion, as well as ISR activation independently of CDK1/2 activation. Importantly, low-dose WEE1 inhibition did not induce ISR activation, while it still synergized with PKMYT1 inhibition. Taken together, WEE1i trigger toxic ISR activation and translational shutdown, which can be prevented by low-dose or combination treatments, while retaining the cell cycle checkpoint-perturbing effects.