Designing a shaped seat-pan cushion to improve postural (dis)comfort reducing pressure distribution and increasing contact area at the interface

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Iolanda Fiorillo (University of Salerno)

Y. Song (TU Delft - Mechatronic Design)

P. Vink (TU Delft - Materials and Manufacturing)

Alessandro Naddeo (University of Salerno)

Research Group
Mechatronic Design
Copyright
© 2021 Iolanda Fiorillo, Y. Song, P. Vink, Alessandro Naddeo
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.111
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 Iolanda Fiorillo, Y. Song, P. Vink, Alessandro Naddeo
Research Group
Mechatronic Design
Volume number
1
Pages (from-to)
1113-1122
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Remaining seated for extended periods increases the risk health issues and discomfort perception. Consequently, the seat-pan design is crucial and could be mainly influenced by two factors: pressure distribution and seat contour. For seat pan discomfort, the lower average pressure is accompanied by less discomfort. Moreover, a seat contour with a large contact area is correlated with more comfort. Thus, a shaped cushion had been accurately designed (Virtual Prototype) and realized (Physical Prototype) aiming to translate the pressure distribution due to interaction between seat and buttock in a geometric shape, suitable for the international population (including P5 females and P95 males). With this shape, the pressure should be more uniform and lower, the contact area at interface bigger, and the perceived comfort higher. Both Virtual and Physical Prototype design had been described in this paper through a repeatable and straightforward approach. Also, experiments had been performed to validate the hypothesis through a comparison with a standard flat cushion. Results showed the goal of the design had been reached: the shaped cushion scored less pressure distribution and higher contact area than the flat cushion.