Social Meritocracy and Unjust Social Hierarchies

Three Proposals to Limit Meritocracy’s Erosion of Social Cooperation

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Elena Ziliotti (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-024-00400-9 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Journal title
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Issue number
4
Volume number
17
Pages (from-to)
581-595
Downloads counter
216
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

A well-functioned society depends on its ability to nurture, attract, and deploy talents in critical sectors. However, the implementation of some meritocratic principles to allocate positions often leads to unjust social hierarchies. Is there, then, a solution to meritocracy’s dysfunctional hierarchical effects? This paper attempts to answer this by drawing on the real-world cases of Singapore and the USA to investigate the relationship of toxic social hierarchies with meritocracy. It proposes three solutions to curb the unjustifiable social stratifications and the erosion of social cooperation often associated with social meritocracy. These reflections could help to shed light on the grounds for the ongoing debates on social hierarchies and provide valuable insights into how to weigh up existing socio-political structures.