Responses to Raven matrices

Governed by visual complexity and centrality

Journal Article (2023)
Authors

Joost C.F. Winter (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Dimitra Dodou (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Y. B. Eisma (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Research Group
Human-Robot Interaction
Copyright
© 2023 J.C.F. de Winter, D. Dodou, Y.B. Eisma
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066231178149
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 J.C.F. de Winter, D. Dodou, Y.B. Eisma
Research Group
Human-Robot Interaction
Issue number
9
Volume number
52
Pages (from-to)
645-661
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066231178149
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Raven matrices are widely considered a pure test of cognitive abilities. Previous research has examined the extent to which cognitive strategies are predictive of the number of correct responses to Raven items. This study examined whether response times can be explained directly from the centrality and visual complexity of the matrix cells (edge density and perceived complexity). A total of 159 participants completed a 12-item version of the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices. In addition to item number (an index of item difficulty), the findings demonstrated a positive correlation between the visual complexity of Raven items and both the mean response time and the number of fixations on the matrix (a strong correlate of response time). Moreover, more centrally placed cells as well as more complex cells received more fixations. It is concluded that response times on Raven matrices are impacted by low-level stimulus attributes, namely, visual complexity and eccentricity.