Resilience, Disaster, and Rebuilding in Modern Port Cities

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

C.M. Hein (TU Delft - History, Form & Aesthetics)

Dirk Schubert (Universität Hamburg)

Research Group
History, Form & Aesthetics
Copyright
© 2020 C.M. Hein, Dirk Schubert
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144220925097
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 C.M. Hein, Dirk Schubert
Research Group
History, Form & Aesthetics
Issue number
2
Volume number
47 (2021)
Pages (from-to)
235-249
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Resilience has become a buzzword used to describe the capacity of cities to bounce back after disasters. It carries the hope of a robust and more sustainable future. Disasters can strike any region, but port cities face complex and particular risks due to their location at the intersection of sea and land, and their role in an international maritime system. This introduction to the special section on resilience, disaster and rebuilding in modern port cities first examines resilience as a concept and course of action in a heterogenous theory landscape. It then explores different dimensions of resilience—environmental, economic, institutional, social and spatial—and their importance in port city historiography. The articles collected in this special section explore case studies from three continents. Together, they demonstrate that there is no such thing as the resilient (port) city. But, they also show that the combination of maritime and urban interests can lead to creative planning for resilience, particularly when port and city authorities pursue the same strategies. In view of contemporary challenges, this special section demonstrates the value of further research on port city resilience and vulnerability. The section raises an important question: Is it possible to balance the wide-ranging economic interests of port actors and their view of waters as sites for shipping with those of local actors concerned about water quality and ecosystems?