Comparison and unification of material-point and optimal transportation meshfree methods

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Lisa Wobbes (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)

R.P.W.M. Tielen (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)

Matthias Möller (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)

C. Vuik (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)

Research Group
Numerical Analysis
Copyright
© 2020 Elizaveta Wobbes, R.P.W.M. Tielen, M. Möller, Cornelis Vuik
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-020-00316-7
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Elizaveta Wobbes, R.P.W.M. Tielen, M. Möller, Cornelis Vuik
Research Group
Numerical Analysis
Bibliographical Note
Green@en
Issue number
1
Volume number
8 (2021)
Pages (from-to)
113-133
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Both the material-point method (MPM) and optimal transportation meshfree (OTM) method have been developed to efficiently solve partial differential equations that are based on the conservation laws from continuum mechanics. However, the methods are derived in a different fashion and have been studied independently of one another. In this paper, we provide a direct step-by-step comparison of the MPM and OTM algorithms. Based on this comparison, we derive the conditions, under which the two approaches can be related to each other, thereby bridging the gap between the MPM and OTM communities. In addition, we introduce a novel unified approach that combines the design principles from B-spline MPM and the OTM method. The proposed approach does not contain user-defined parameters and can decrease the costs of the standard OTM method. Moreover, it allows for the use of a consistent mass matrix without stability issues that are typically encountered in MPM computations.