Life-cycle assessment of marine biofuels from thermochemical liquefaction of different olive residues in Spain

Book Chapter (2023)
Author(s)

S. Chandrasekaran (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Puck Wammes (Student TU Delft)

John A. Posada (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Research Group
BT/Biotechnology and Society
Copyright
© 2023 S. Chandrasekaran, Puck Wammes, J.A. Posada Duque
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15274-0.50541-2
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 S. Chandrasekaran, Puck Wammes, J.A. Posada Duque
Research Group
BT/Biotechnology and Society
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Pages (from-to)
3393-3398
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Advanced biofuels from thermochemical liquefaction, such as pyrolysis (PY) and Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), of olive residues in the Andalusian region of Spain (specifically in the province of Jaen) can potentially play a crucial role in the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the maritime sector. In this study, an attributional life-cycle assessment (ALCA) was performed to estimate and compare the GHG emissions for producing marine biofuels via pyrolysis and HTL from olive pomace (COP) and pruning biomass (OTPB), to provide 1 megajoule (MJ) of marine biofuel, as a functional unit. For convenience, the different technology-feedstock combination scenarios are represented as scenario 1 (PY_COP), scenario 2 (PY_OTPB), scenario 3 (HTL_COP), and scenario 4 (HTL_OTPB). The life-cycle GHG emissions of the biofuels were 42.0, 44.1, 22.1, and 32.1 g CO2-eq/MJ for PY_COP, PY_OTPB, HTL_COP and HTL_OTPB scenarios, respectively, corresponding to 47–73% GHG emissions reduction compared with petroleum fuels. The scenarios were also evaluated based on other impact categories such as Sulphur dioxide in the air, Nitrogen oxides in the air, Particulates in the air, and Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) in the air. The scenarios reduced the SO2 emissions, Nitrogen emissions, NVMOCs, and particulates in the air by at least 50%, 90%, 20%, and 25% respectively in comparison to fossil fuels. A contribution analysis revealed that olive cultivation and upgrading as hot spots for emission in pyrolysis-based systems. Likewise, HTL conversion and upgrading steps were emitting more emissions for an HTL-based system. Therefore, marine biofuel obtained through the thermochemical conversion of olive residues has better environmental performance on a life cycle basis, with a preference for HTL based system over pyrolysis.

Files

1_s2.0_B9780443152740505412_ma... (pdf)
(pdf | 0.498 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-02-2024
License info not available