Interface reduction for Hurty/Craig-Bampton substructured models

Review and improvements

Review (2019)
Research Group
Ship Hydromechanics and Structures
Copyright
© 2019 Dimitri Krattiger, L. Wu, Martin Zacharczuk, Martin Buck, Robert J. Kuether, Matthew S. Allen, P. Tiso, Matthew R.W. Brake
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.031
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 Dimitri Krattiger, L. Wu, Martin Zacharczuk, Martin Buck, Robert J. Kuether, Matthew S. Allen, P. Tiso, Matthew R.W. Brake
Research Group
Ship Hydromechanics and Structures
Volume number
114
Pages (from-to)
579-603
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The Hurty/Craig-Bampton method in structural dynamics represents the interior dynamics of each subcomponent in a substructured system with a truncated set of normal modes and retains all of the physical degrees of freedom at the substructure interfaces. This makes the assembly of substructures into a reduced-order system model relatively simple, but means that the reduced-order assembly will have as many interface degrees of freedom as the full model. When the full-model mesh is highly refined, and/or when the system is divided into many subcomponents, this can lead to an unacceptably large system of equations of motion. To overcome this, interface reduction methods aim to reduce the size of the Hurty/Craig-Bampton model by reducing the number of interface degrees of freedom. This research presents a survey of interface reduction methods for Hurty/Craig-Bampton models, and proposes improvements and generalizations to some of the methods. Some of these interface reductions operate on the assembled system-level matrices while others perform reduction locally by considering the uncoupled substructures. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods are highlighted and assessed through comparisons of results obtained from a variety of representative linear FE models.

Files

1_s2.0_S088832701830284X_am_s0... (pdf)
(pdf | 3.13 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 25-05-2019