Solid and liquid state speciation of chromium of relevance for health

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Yolanda S. Hedberg (TU Delft - Team Arjan Mol, University of Western Ontario, Queen’s University)

Mark C. Biesinger (Queen’s University, University of Western Ontario)

Zhiqiang Wang (University of Western Ontario, Queen’s University)

Research Group
Team Arjan Mol
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjc-2025-0118 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Team Arjan Mol
Journal title
Canadian Journal of Chemistry
Issue number
3
Volume number
104
Pages (from-to)
218-229
Downloads counter
2
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The chemical form (chemical speciation) of chromium (Cr) is important for human health. Hexavalent Cr (CrVI), present as oxyanions in water, is of great concern even at trace levels. Here, we briefly describe and discuss common and additional liquid state (often standardized) and solid state Cr speciation methods for typical samples of health concerns. This review covers common standardized, extraction-based liquid state methods and various solid state Cr speciation methods. Liquid state methods include chromatography, colorimetric methods, mass spectrometry, and electrochemical methods, with widely varying detection limit ranges to accommodate all sample needs. The most sensitive liquid state method can detect trace amounts of CrVI in the nanograms per litre range. Colorimetric methods can be used both for the liquid and solid state and are the simplest methods without the need for a laboratory or equipment. Other solid state methods include vibrational spectroscopy, electrochemical methods, and various laboratory-or synchrotron-based methods: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. No method is perfect on its own, and we therefore recommend best practices, the investigation of potential interfering agents, and validating the method with another method. However, the largest threat to accurate Cr speciation-based hazard assessments is the dynamic change of Cr speciation in a potential exposure scenario or during sample preparation for the analytical method. To avoid wrong conclusions, we recommend considering the Cr chemistry, the sample chemistry, and the method-specific interferences and detection limits.