Magnetic resonance thermometry for hyperthermia in the oropharynx region

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Theresa Feddersen (Erasmus MC)

Juan A Hernandez-Tamames (Erasmus MC, TU Delft - ImPhys/Vos group)

Margarethus M. Paulides (Erasmus MC, Eindhoven University of Technology)

Michiel Kroesen (Erasmus MC)

Gerard Van Rhoon (TU Delft - RST/Applied Radiation & Isotopes, Erasmus MC)

Dirk Poot (Erasmus MC)

Research Group
ImPhys/Vos group
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2024.2352545
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
ImPhys/Vos group
Issue number
1
Volume number
41
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) can measure in-vivo 3D-temperature changes in real-time and noninvasively. However, for the oropharynx region and the entire head and neck, motion potentially introduces large artifacts. Considering long treatment times of 60–90 min, this study aims to evaluate whether MRT around the oropharynx is clinically feasible for hyperthermia treatments and quantify the effects of breathing and swallowing on MRT performance. A 3D-ME-FGRE sequence was used in a phantom cooling down and around the oropharynx of five volunteers over ∼75 min. The imaging protocol consisted of imaging with acceleration (ARC = 2), number of image averages (NEX = 1,2 and 3). For volunteers, the acquisitions included a breath-hold scan and scans with deliberate swallowing. MRT performance was quantified in neck muscle, spinal cord and masseter muscle, using mean average error (MAE), mean error (ME) and spatial standard deviation (SD). In phantom, an increase in NEX leads to a significant decrease in SD, but MAE and ME were unchanged. No significant difference was found in volunteers between the different scans. There was a significant difference between the regions evaluated: neck muscle had the best MAE (=1.96 °C) and SD (=0.82 °C), followed by spinal cord (MAE = 3.17 °C, SD = 0.92 °C) and masseter muscle (MAE = 4.53 °C, SD = 1.16 °C). Concerning the ME, spinal cord did best, then neck muscle and masseter muscle, with values of −0.64 °C, 1.15 °C and −3.05 °C respectively. Breathing, swallowing, and different ways of imaging (acceleration and NEX) do not significantly influence the MRT performance in the oropharynx region. The ROI selected however, leads to significant differences.