Same, Same, but Different

Algorithmic Diversification of Viewpoints in News

Conference Paper (2018)
Author(s)

N. Tintarev (TU Delft - Web Information Systems)

E. Sullivan (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Dror Guldin (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

S. Qui (TU Delft - Web Information Systems)

Daan Odjik (Blendle Research)

Research Group
Web Information Systems
Copyright
© 2018 N. Tintarev, Emily Sullivan, Dror Guldin, S. Qiu, Daan Odjik
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1145/3213586.3226203
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 N. Tintarev, Emily Sullivan, Dror Guldin, S. Qiu, Daan Odjik
Research Group
Web Information Systems
Bibliographical Note
Accepted author manuscript@en
Pages (from-to)
7-13
ISBN (print)
978-1-4503-5784-5
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Recommender systems for news articles on social media select and filter content through automatic personalization. As a result, users are often unaware of opposing points of view, leading to informational blindspots and potentially polarized opinions. They may be aware of a topic, but only be exposed to one viewpoint on this topic. However, recommender systems have just as much potential to help users find a plurality of viewpoints. In this spirit, this paper introduces an approach to automatically identifying content that represents a wider range of opinions on a given topic. Our offline results show positive results for our distance measure with regard to diversification on topic and channel. However, our user study results confirm that user acceptance of this diversification also needs to be addressed in tandem to enable a complete solution.

Files

Same_Same_but_Different.pdf
(pdf | 0.756 Mb)
License info not available