Knowledge co-production for decision-making in human-natural systems under uncertainty

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Enayat A. Moallemi (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO))

Fateme Zare (University of New South Wales)

Aniek Hebinck ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Katrina Szetey (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO))

Edmundo Molina-Perez (Tecnologico de Monterrey)

Romy L. Zyngier (Deakin University)

Michalis Hadjikakou (Deakin University)

Jan Kwakkel (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Marjolijn Haasnoot (Universiteit Utrecht, Deltares)

undefined More Authors (External organisation)

Research Group
Policy Analysis
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102727 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Research Group
Policy Analysis
Journal title
Global Environmental Change
Volume number
82
Article number
102727
Page Views
317
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Decision-making under uncertainty is important for managing human-natural systems in a changing world. A major source of uncertainty is linked to the multi-actor settings of decisions with poorly understood values, complex relationships, and conflicting management approaches. Despite general agreement across disciplines on co-producing knowledge for viable and inclusive outcomes in a multi-actor context, there is still limited conceptual clarity and no systematic understanding on what co-production means in decision-making under uncertainty and how it can be approached. Here, we use content analysis and clustering to systematically analyse 50 decision-making cases with multiple time and spatial scales across 26 countries and in 9 different sectors in the last decade to serve two aims. The first is to synthesise the key recurring strategies that underpin high quality decision co-production across many cases of diverse features. The second is to identify important deficits and opportunities to leverage existing strategies towards flourishing co-production in support of decision-making. We find that four general strategies emerge centred around: promoting innovation for robust and equitable decisions; broadening the span of co-production across interacting systems; fostering social learning and inclusive participation; and improving pathways to impact. Additionally, five key areas that should be addressed to improve decision co-production are identified in relation to: participation diversity; collaborative action; power relationships; governance inclusivity; and transformative change. Characterising the emergent strategies and their key areas for improvement can help guide future works towards more pluralistic and integrated science and practice.