Knowledge co-production for decision-making in human-natural systems under uncertainty
Enayat A. Moallemi (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO))
Fateme Zare (University of New South Wales)
Aniek Hebinck ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)
Katrina Szetey (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO))
Edmundo Molina-Perez (Tecnologico de Monterrey)
Romy L. Zyngier (Deakin University)
Michalis Hadjikakou (Deakin University)
Jan Kwakkel (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)
Marjolijn Haasnoot (Universiteit Utrecht, Deltares)
undefined More Authors (External organisation)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Decision-making under uncertainty is important for managing human-natural systems in a changing world. A major source of uncertainty is linked to the multi-actor settings of decisions with poorly understood values, complex relationships, and conflicting management approaches. Despite general agreement across disciplines on co-producing knowledge for viable and inclusive outcomes in a multi-actor context, there is still limited conceptual clarity and no systematic understanding on what co-production means in decision-making under uncertainty and how it can be approached. Here, we use content analysis and clustering to systematically analyse 50 decision-making cases with multiple time and spatial scales across 26 countries and in 9 different sectors in the last decade to serve two aims. The first is to synthesise the key recurring strategies that underpin high quality decision co-production across many cases of diverse features. The second is to identify important deficits and opportunities to leverage existing strategies towards flourishing co-production in support of decision-making. We find that four general strategies emerge centred around: promoting innovation for robust and equitable decisions; broadening the span of co-production across interacting systems; fostering social learning and inclusive participation; and improving pathways to impact. Additionally, five key areas that should be addressed to improve decision co-production are identified in relation to: participation diversity; collaborative action; power relationships; governance inclusivity; and transformative change. Characterising the emergent strategies and their key areas for improvement can help guide future works towards more pluralistic and integrated science and practice.