High-strength steel: ultimate material or expensive alternative?

High-strength steel: ultimate material or expensive alternative?: Feasibility and optimization of using high-strength structural steel in offshore topsides

Dekkers, Wout (TU Delft Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering; TU Delft Offshore and Dredging Engineering)

Hoving, J.S. (mentor)
van der Stap, A.C.M. (graduation committee)
Tankova, T. (graduation committee)

Delft University of Technology

Offshore and Dredging Engineering

2024-01-26

Steel is a widely used material in construction because of its availability, high strength-to-weight ratio, and recyclability. However, steel manufacturing consumes a lot of energy, and there is an increasing demand for more environmentally friendly building materials. Consequently, high-strength steel is becoming more popular as it reduces the mass of a structure. Although high-strength steel has been available for many years, its use in offshore topsides is limited due to stability and deflection issues. This research aimed to assess the feasibility of utilizing high-strength structural steel in offshore topsides, and investigated how the use of high-strength steel can be optimized in topside design.

Two different screening tools were constructed to assess the feasibility of high-strength steel within an entire topside. It was concluded that the length of a particular beam can tell an engineer if it is worth further investigating the potential of high-strength steel, while columns showed potential in all cases. The methods were tested with a case study in which an topside was assessed for its feasibility of utilizing high-strength steel beams and columns. Only hot-rolled primary and secondary beams combined with the columns and bracings were considered for this topside. When S460M steel was used for strength-governing beams and seamless tubulars, in combination with S690Q steel for welded tubular columns, the highest benefits were found and a maximum steel weight reduction of 15% was found for the considered components. At the same time, the material costs were reduced by 10%, the welding costs by 13% and the embodied carbon savings equalled 14%. When comparing these results with the total topside steel weight, 5% of the topside steel weight was reduced by using a combination of S460 and S690 steels. It was concluded that high-strength steel is feasible for offshore topsides and is more environmentally friendly and cost-effective, providing a promising alternative to conventional steels within certain components on offshore topsides.

This research presented a screening tool that is simple to use and assessed the feasibility of high-strength steel. Other engineers can easily extend this tool. As more detailed calculations are included in the screening tool, it is expected that additional cost reductions and embodied carbon savings can be found. Furthermore, including additional steel components in the assessment, such as plate girders, may result in finding much higher total weight reductions.

Offshore Topsides
High-strength steels
Structural Engineering

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:4e40b7d4-975e-4b88-b87b-f247fadc343a

Student theses

master thesis

© 2024 Wout Dekkers