A.C.M. van der Stap
Please Note
17 records found
1
Develop a framework to be used to improve planning and execution of offshore T&I operations
Case Study: Concrete caisson T&I operations in the North Sea
By first identifying the key uncertainties that cause delays in offshore T&I projects through an in-depth literature review, the model was then tailored to capture them effectively. A hypothetical case study on transporting and installing prefabricated concrete caissons for the construction of an energy island is used to verify and demonstrate the capabilities of the model. Two strategies were assessed, one using a semi-submersible barge and one using the wet-tow method for transportation. Monte Carlo simulations were applied to capture the impact of the weather and operational uncertainties, as well as the probability of failure events. The results show that project performance is strongly influenced by factors such as execution timing, the simplicity of the operational step sequence and the operability limits.
The model is designed to be easily adaptable to a wide variety of offshore operations. Its structured outputs provide engineers and planners with a powerful tool to evaluate how critical parameters (e.g. weather conditions) affect the project performance and explore alternatives to determine the optimal one, in terms of time and resource availability.
...
By first identifying the key uncertainties that cause delays in offshore T&I projects through an in-depth literature review, the model was then tailored to capture them effectively. A hypothetical case study on transporting and installing prefabricated concrete caissons for the construction of an energy island is used to verify and demonstrate the capabilities of the model. Two strategies were assessed, one using a semi-submersible barge and one using the wet-tow method for transportation. Monte Carlo simulations were applied to capture the impact of the weather and operational uncertainties, as well as the probability of failure events. The results show that project performance is strongly influenced by factors such as execution timing, the simplicity of the operational step sequence and the operability limits.
The model is designed to be easily adaptable to a wide variety of offshore operations. Its structured outputs provide engineers and planners with a powerful tool to evaluate how critical parameters (e.g. weather conditions) affect the project performance and explore alternatives to determine the optimal one, in terms of time and resource availability.
This study aims to investigate major contributors to fatigue on XXL monopiles supporting 15 MW and 22 MW turbines based on metocean conditions across different geographical locations. Furthermore, the impact of guyed monopiles has been analysed based on numerous water depths and soil parameters. These aspects have been largely unexplored in the existing literature.
The research uses a frequency domain monopile fatigue estimation method that integrates aerodynamic effects with hydrodynamic excitations. The method assumes a uniform wind profile and white noise wave spectrum to compute the stress response spectrum. By applying a linear correlation between the stress response spectrum and hydrodynamic excitation, the stress is determined over a wave scatter diagram, considering the joint probability of wind-wave conditions. The approach uses time series loads, computed by the aero-hydro-servo-elastic load analysis tool OpenFAST. Additionally, a dimension scaling reduction is used to reduce the mass of the monopile when incorporating the guyed lines.
The findings reveal that fatigue is dominated by scenarios lacking aerodynamic damping, such as wind-wave misalignment and idling, where directional spreading of metocean conditions has lower influence. Furthermore, fatigue damage is significantly affected by the positioning of the system’s natural frequency relative to the peak wave period. A noted limitation to the model is the exclusion of turbulent wind effects.
Regarding the guyed monopile analysis, the dimension reduction strategy shows a significant mass reduction in deeper waters. The stiffness of the system is determined by the tendon parameters, where the envelope of the natural frequency is larger in clay conditions than for sand conditions, and it increases for increasing water depth. Using a feasible tendon set-up shows higher fatigue damages at the critical location when compared with the conventional monopile fatigue damage. However, lower fatigue damages are found at other locations along the monopile length. Additionally, it is concluded that using stiff tendons results in a high risk of snap loads especially when creep of the tendon lines is considered. The results show potential for guyed monopile systems especially in deeper waters, reducing the mass, whilst maintaining similar fatigue damages as conventional monopiles. These results encourage the need for extra research on the topic of guyed monopile systems.
...
This study aims to investigate major contributors to fatigue on XXL monopiles supporting 15 MW and 22 MW turbines based on metocean conditions across different geographical locations. Furthermore, the impact of guyed monopiles has been analysed based on numerous water depths and soil parameters. These aspects have been largely unexplored in the existing literature.
The research uses a frequency domain monopile fatigue estimation method that integrates aerodynamic effects with hydrodynamic excitations. The method assumes a uniform wind profile and white noise wave spectrum to compute the stress response spectrum. By applying a linear correlation between the stress response spectrum and hydrodynamic excitation, the stress is determined over a wave scatter diagram, considering the joint probability of wind-wave conditions. The approach uses time series loads, computed by the aero-hydro-servo-elastic load analysis tool OpenFAST. Additionally, a dimension scaling reduction is used to reduce the mass of the monopile when incorporating the guyed lines.
The findings reveal that fatigue is dominated by scenarios lacking aerodynamic damping, such as wind-wave misalignment and idling, where directional spreading of metocean conditions has lower influence. Furthermore, fatigue damage is significantly affected by the positioning of the system’s natural frequency relative to the peak wave period. A noted limitation to the model is the exclusion of turbulent wind effects.
Regarding the guyed monopile analysis, the dimension reduction strategy shows a significant mass reduction in deeper waters. The stiffness of the system is determined by the tendon parameters, where the envelope of the natural frequency is larger in clay conditions than for sand conditions, and it increases for increasing water depth. Using a feasible tendon set-up shows higher fatigue damages at the critical location when compared with the conventional monopile fatigue damage. However, lower fatigue damages are found at other locations along the monopile length. Additionally, it is concluded that using stiff tendons results in a high risk of snap loads especially when creep of the tendon lines is considered. The results show potential for guyed monopile systems especially in deeper waters, reducing the mass, whilst maintaining similar fatigue damages as conventional monopiles. These results encourage the need for extra research on the topic of guyed monopile systems.
Design of a suction pile installation template
A case study on the implementation and design of a suction pile installation template as an installation aid for suction pile foundation installations
To bound the scope of the research, assumptions are made regarding the installation vessel, foundation dimensions, jacket-pile connection, and site specifications based on a case study and the resources of DEME. To design the SPIT, the use of the SPIT is analysed, considering a wide range of design options. The most significant inputs to the analysis are the limitations of the installation vessel and operational efficiency. Next, the changes to the suction pile and jacket frame are examined. The selected grout connection between the suction pile and the jacket frame creates a jacket frame similar to a standard pin pile jacket. The suction pile requires a stub on top of the top-plate. An optimization study is conducted to determine the size of the stub. These two analyses provide the general design requirements for the SPIT, which is then checked for structural strength, installation tolerance of the suction piles and lift capacity. The checks are based on industry standard codes.
Analysis shows that the hydrodynamic loading on the suction piles induces the largest loads on the SPIT. However, if the suction piles are incorrectly placed in the seabed, the interaction between the soil and the suction piles could result in even larger loads on the SPIT. The models used in this thesis should provide conservative estimates. In future research, the analysis of hydrodynamic loading, geotechnical analysis, and dynamic response of the SPIT should be verified and justified using more sophisticated models and/or simulation software.
The results from this thesis indicate that the proposed design of the SPIT provides a solution to extent the installation of SPJ for OWT. The research identifies four key design challenges. Each challenge indicates solvable obstacles to the design of the SPIT. Based on the results, the estimated total weight of the SPIT is 240mt. DEME's installation vessel, the Orion, has sufficient lift capacity to perform the installation and deck-space to perform up to 13 installations in one trip.
...
To bound the scope of the research, assumptions are made regarding the installation vessel, foundation dimensions, jacket-pile connection, and site specifications based on a case study and the resources of DEME. To design the SPIT, the use of the SPIT is analysed, considering a wide range of design options. The most significant inputs to the analysis are the limitations of the installation vessel and operational efficiency. Next, the changes to the suction pile and jacket frame are examined. The selected grout connection between the suction pile and the jacket frame creates a jacket frame similar to a standard pin pile jacket. The suction pile requires a stub on top of the top-plate. An optimization study is conducted to determine the size of the stub. These two analyses provide the general design requirements for the SPIT, which is then checked for structural strength, installation tolerance of the suction piles and lift capacity. The checks are based on industry standard codes.
Analysis shows that the hydrodynamic loading on the suction piles induces the largest loads on the SPIT. However, if the suction piles are incorrectly placed in the seabed, the interaction between the soil and the suction piles could result in even larger loads on the SPIT. The models used in this thesis should provide conservative estimates. In future research, the analysis of hydrodynamic loading, geotechnical analysis, and dynamic response of the SPIT should be verified and justified using more sophisticated models and/or simulation software.
The results from this thesis indicate that the proposed design of the SPIT provides a solution to extent the installation of SPJ for OWT. The research identifies four key design challenges. Each challenge indicates solvable obstacles to the design of the SPIT. Based on the results, the estimated total weight of the SPIT is 240mt. DEME's installation vessel, the Orion, has sufficient lift capacity to perform the installation and deck-space to perform up to 13 installations in one trip.
Vulnerabilities of the three-leg moored TetraSpar floating offshore wind turbine
Are the risks of the TetraSpar mooring system ALARP?
The study conducts a structural assessment of retrofitting offshore foundations with a 500 kW AWE system, covering the ultimate limit state (ULS) and fatigue limit state (FLS) evaluations. ULS calculations confirm that the foundations can withstand new AWE-generated wind and wave loads without exceeding design limits. Fatigue assessments demonstrate substantial expected foundation lifespans, even with a 99% initial damage assumption, suggesting AWE retrofitting preserves structural integrity.
Other AWE retrofitting scenarios are considered as well. Retaining the tower and mounting the 500 kW AWE system atop the tower is deemed possible, resulting in higher capacity factors. Calculations using a 2MW AWE system are performed as well. This is structurally possible, but the AWE technology of that size still faces technological challenges.
The economic feasibility of AWE system retrofitting is assessed through income and cost evaluations, comparing it to repowering with larger WTs. Results indicate competitive LCoE values for tower-mounted AWE compared to WT repowering, offsetting decommissioning costs and promising sustainable energy generation. Notably, 2 MW AWE systems exhibit economic potential in various scenarios.
This research contributes valuable insights into the viability of AWE retrofitting for ageing OWFs with AWE technology, offering a sustainable pathway forward and highlighting both the possibilities and challenges of this approach. ...
The study conducts a structural assessment of retrofitting offshore foundations with a 500 kW AWE system, covering the ultimate limit state (ULS) and fatigue limit state (FLS) evaluations. ULS calculations confirm that the foundations can withstand new AWE-generated wind and wave loads without exceeding design limits. Fatigue assessments demonstrate substantial expected foundation lifespans, even with a 99% initial damage assumption, suggesting AWE retrofitting preserves structural integrity.
Other AWE retrofitting scenarios are considered as well. Retaining the tower and mounting the 500 kW AWE system atop the tower is deemed possible, resulting in higher capacity factors. Calculations using a 2MW AWE system are performed as well. This is structurally possible, but the AWE technology of that size still faces technological challenges.
The economic feasibility of AWE system retrofitting is assessed through income and cost evaluations, comparing it to repowering with larger WTs. Results indicate competitive LCoE values for tower-mounted AWE compared to WT repowering, offsetting decommissioning costs and promising sustainable energy generation. Notably, 2 MW AWE systems exhibit economic potential in various scenarios.
This research contributes valuable insights into the viability of AWE retrofitting for ageing OWFs with AWE technology, offering a sustainable pathway forward and highlighting both the possibilities and challenges of this approach.
Stern vs Side installation of Monopiles from floating vessels
Objective comparison methods to make a distinction between side and stern installation of future Monopiles
In the variety of monopile (MP) installation methods, a distinction exists between installation over the side of a vessel and a novel method where the procedure is repositioned to the vessel’s stern. Experts in the field were convinced that stern installation would be necessary for growing MPs and extended installation timeslots. This thesis aims to create an objective distinction between the installation directions by looking at the following two installation steps.
First, the storage of MPs on the deck of an installation vessel is investigated. For side installation, the MPs are positioned transversely on the deck. This method uses little deck space per MP but includes an overhang which might badly influence the vessel’s behaviour. The latter has been investigated
using the Moment of Inertia (MoI) of the vessel as an indicator of this behaviour. It has been found that transverse storage affects the MoI significantly more than longitudinal storage. However, this longitudinal storage is limited to 4 MPs per transit due to stability, whereas the transverse method can take 6 MPs. The stresses in the MP itself have also been evaluated for these storage methods, as the support locations were different. It has been concluded that there is indeed a difference, but the stress level has been found not governing for this choice.
Second, the upending procedure is investigated, as this is a step in the procedure which is highly influenced by motions and external wave impact. A model is developed that uses tugger line connections from the vessel to the MP to define forces in equipment objectively. It has been found that loads in the tugger lines were significantly lower for stern installation compared to side installation, which leads to a workability comparison. This comparison is based on a specific tugger cable, limited to a 300𝑚𝑡 tugger load. A range of sea states has been analysed and checked on this maximal tugger load. The workability difference for full-year performance is found to go from 64% for side installation to 96% for stern installation. It is realised that these numbers are high compared to the actual installation, but as the assumptions made for this model are equal for side and stern, these percentages are a good comparison between the two methods. The assumptions on which this model is based are checked on
sensitivity, which results in reasonable trend lines and an interesting prospect into the future.
The model presented in this thesis could pose as a hypothetical concept for future installation, and therefore a determination of the natural frequency is added in this thesis. With this natural frequency, the feasibility of a concept can be quickly assessed even though no time-domain simulations have been
executed. The model stays clear from natural periods of the control system and periods of the waves for a large range of upending angles. However, in a nearly vertical position, the control frequency is crossed and later, the regime of wave frequencies is encountered. Adjusting the model slightly in terms of geometry shows that these issues can be solved. However, future research is highly recommended into a time simulation of the model.
Finally, some practical applications of the installation over the side and stern are discussed. Concluding this thesis, the main research question can be answered positively by stating that stern installation can be used to improve the all-year MP installation performance of a floating installation vessel. ...
In the variety of monopile (MP) installation methods, a distinction exists between installation over the side of a vessel and a novel method where the procedure is repositioned to the vessel’s stern. Experts in the field were convinced that stern installation would be necessary for growing MPs and extended installation timeslots. This thesis aims to create an objective distinction between the installation directions by looking at the following two installation steps.
First, the storage of MPs on the deck of an installation vessel is investigated. For side installation, the MPs are positioned transversely on the deck. This method uses little deck space per MP but includes an overhang which might badly influence the vessel’s behaviour. The latter has been investigated
using the Moment of Inertia (MoI) of the vessel as an indicator of this behaviour. It has been found that transverse storage affects the MoI significantly more than longitudinal storage. However, this longitudinal storage is limited to 4 MPs per transit due to stability, whereas the transverse method can take 6 MPs. The stresses in the MP itself have also been evaluated for these storage methods, as the support locations were different. It has been concluded that there is indeed a difference, but the stress level has been found not governing for this choice.
Second, the upending procedure is investigated, as this is a step in the procedure which is highly influenced by motions and external wave impact. A model is developed that uses tugger line connections from the vessel to the MP to define forces in equipment objectively. It has been found that loads in the tugger lines were significantly lower for stern installation compared to side installation, which leads to a workability comparison. This comparison is based on a specific tugger cable, limited to a 300𝑚𝑡 tugger load. A range of sea states has been analysed and checked on this maximal tugger load. The workability difference for full-year performance is found to go from 64% for side installation to 96% for stern installation. It is realised that these numbers are high compared to the actual installation, but as the assumptions made for this model are equal for side and stern, these percentages are a good comparison between the two methods. The assumptions on which this model is based are checked on
sensitivity, which results in reasonable trend lines and an interesting prospect into the future.
The model presented in this thesis could pose as a hypothetical concept for future installation, and therefore a determination of the natural frequency is added in this thesis. With this natural frequency, the feasibility of a concept can be quickly assessed even though no time-domain simulations have been
executed. The model stays clear from natural periods of the control system and periods of the waves for a large range of upending angles. However, in a nearly vertical position, the control frequency is crossed and later, the regime of wave frequencies is encountered. Adjusting the model slightly in terms of geometry shows that these issues can be solved. However, future research is highly recommended into a time simulation of the model.
Finally, some practical applications of the installation over the side and stern are discussed. Concluding this thesis, the main research question can be answered positively by stating that stern installation can be used to improve the all-year MP installation performance of a floating installation vessel.
Offshore Pile Drilling From a Floating Vessel
A Dynamic Heave Compensation Analysis
Firstly, the research assesses the maximum allowable topside displacements before the drilling column reaches either the operational limits of plastic failure or bottom hole assembly lift-off. Secondly, the operational vessel motions are determined for the relevant environmental conditions. By comparing the results, the need for HC in the drilling configuration is determined. Third and finally, the passive and active HC methods are assessed for a 3-hourly time simulation under the before-mentioned environmental conditions. The assessment is performed using two performance criteria; weight on bit variation and the occurring drill-string stresses.
The performed analyses and simulations show that the vertical upward vessel motion is the limiting factor for the operation’s workability. Also, HC is required in every considered environmental condition. Further, the system operating with passive compensation shows a decreased stiffness with respect to the active system, most noticeable at 50 m water depth. This leads to higher frequency vibrations and stress variations being present in the drill-string of the active system. This effect is no longer noticeable for water depths larger than 50 m.
For locations with a water depth of 50 m, the active system shows favourable workability results. The active system shows a larger sensitivity to wave conditions with larger wave heights, as the stiffness is larger and more stress variations occur as a response. However, the results remain more favourable in comparison to the passive system as the lift-off percentage is significantly smaller. The passive and active systems show similar results when considering short waves in 50 m water depth, this is best witnessed in the weight on bit and lift-off percentages.
For locations with a water depth of 100 m and 200 m, the active and passive HC systems show comparable results for the performance criteria, for all considered wave conditions. The stresses remain within the ultimate limit state, the fatigue damage is negligible in comparison to the time required to perform the drilling operation, and the lift-off percentage for both configurations are in the same order. Therefore, as the workability of the two systems are so comparable for a water depth of 100 m and 200 m the availability, day-rate, and mobilisation complexity of the equipment will determine which HC system is most effective per project. ...
Firstly, the research assesses the maximum allowable topside displacements before the drilling column reaches either the operational limits of plastic failure or bottom hole assembly lift-off. Secondly, the operational vessel motions are determined for the relevant environmental conditions. By comparing the results, the need for HC in the drilling configuration is determined. Third and finally, the passive and active HC methods are assessed for a 3-hourly time simulation under the before-mentioned environmental conditions. The assessment is performed using two performance criteria; weight on bit variation and the occurring drill-string stresses.
The performed analyses and simulations show that the vertical upward vessel motion is the limiting factor for the operation’s workability. Also, HC is required in every considered environmental condition. Further, the system operating with passive compensation shows a decreased stiffness with respect to the active system, most noticeable at 50 m water depth. This leads to higher frequency vibrations and stress variations being present in the drill-string of the active system. This effect is no longer noticeable for water depths larger than 50 m.
For locations with a water depth of 50 m, the active system shows favourable workability results. The active system shows a larger sensitivity to wave conditions with larger wave heights, as the stiffness is larger and more stress variations occur as a response. However, the results remain more favourable in comparison to the passive system as the lift-off percentage is significantly smaller. The passive and active systems show similar results when considering short waves in 50 m water depth, this is best witnessed in the weight on bit and lift-off percentages.
For locations with a water depth of 100 m and 200 m, the active and passive HC systems show comparable results for the performance criteria, for all considered wave conditions. The stresses remain within the ultimate limit state, the fatigue damage is negligible in comparison to the time required to perform the drilling operation, and the lift-off percentage for both configurations are in the same order. Therefore, as the workability of the two systems are so comparable for a water depth of 100 m and 200 m the availability, day-rate, and mobilisation complexity of the equipment will determine which HC system is most effective per project.
Workability optimisation of the Stella Synergy
During monopile installation with a motion-compensated gripper and using its DP-system
This model is built in Anysim, which is a time-domain simulation software program of MARIN based on the RK2 numerical method. The model considers the early pile driving phase because this phase is governing in terms of risk. The monopile acts as an inverted pendulum in this phase, and the motion-compensated pile gripper must guarantee the stability of the monopile. The vessel uses its DP-system for station keeping. The DP-system contains a position reference system, a filter, a control system, and a thruster allocation algorithm.
The vessel describes the wind, current and wave forces on the monopile and vessel. The environmental conditions are assumed to be collinear, and wave spreading is added to the model for some simulations. The wave forces on the vessel are determined with diffraction calculations in Ansys AQWA. The diffraction calculation for the vessel is verified with a diffraction calculation of MARIN, and the diffraction calculation for the monopile considers the shielding effect and is verified with a calculation with the Morison equation.
A motion-compensated pile gripper with two PD-controllers is built in Python. The gripper considers static and dynamic friction forces and a maximum delta force per numeric timestep to model the pressure build-up time of the hydraulic cylinders.
Multiple 3-hour simulations are run to generate results. These simulations, which considers each a different sea condition, are tested by the six limitations of the model. First, the preferable incoming angle of environmental conditions is determined. The workability of the Stella Synergy is calculated operating at the North Sea using this preferable incoming angle of attack. Then, two adaptations to the model are tested to increase the workability. Using fast-rotating thrusters or changing the DP-gains result in the workability of 96.4%. The governing limitation is the pitch motion of the vessel.
It is tested if using mooring lines in combination with the DP-system results in a footprint reduction. It is concluded that adding mooring lines could result in a footprint reduction, but it is crucial to gain insight into the optimal axial stiffness of the mooring lines. The monopile's influence on the vessel's motion is also tested. It is concluded that the vessel's surge, sway, roll and yaw motion increases significantly due to the environmental forces on the monopile, which are passed through the gripper to the vessel. Finally, the workability of the vessel during the worst-case single failure is determined. After improving the DP-gains for particular sea conditions, the workability for the worst-case single failure was 96.0%. The failure results thus in a minor difference in the workability.
...
This model is built in Anysim, which is a time-domain simulation software program of MARIN based on the RK2 numerical method. The model considers the early pile driving phase because this phase is governing in terms of risk. The monopile acts as an inverted pendulum in this phase, and the motion-compensated pile gripper must guarantee the stability of the monopile. The vessel uses its DP-system for station keeping. The DP-system contains a position reference system, a filter, a control system, and a thruster allocation algorithm.
The vessel describes the wind, current and wave forces on the monopile and vessel. The environmental conditions are assumed to be collinear, and wave spreading is added to the model for some simulations. The wave forces on the vessel are determined with diffraction calculations in Ansys AQWA. The diffraction calculation for the vessel is verified with a diffraction calculation of MARIN, and the diffraction calculation for the monopile considers the shielding effect and is verified with a calculation with the Morison equation.
A motion-compensated pile gripper with two PD-controllers is built in Python. The gripper considers static and dynamic friction forces and a maximum delta force per numeric timestep to model the pressure build-up time of the hydraulic cylinders.
Multiple 3-hour simulations are run to generate results. These simulations, which considers each a different sea condition, are tested by the six limitations of the model. First, the preferable incoming angle of environmental conditions is determined. The workability of the Stella Synergy is calculated operating at the North Sea using this preferable incoming angle of attack. Then, two adaptations to the model are tested to increase the workability. Using fast-rotating thrusters or changing the DP-gains result in the workability of 96.4%. The governing limitation is the pitch motion of the vessel.
It is tested if using mooring lines in combination with the DP-system results in a footprint reduction. It is concluded that adding mooring lines could result in a footprint reduction, but it is crucial to gain insight into the optimal axial stiffness of the mooring lines. The monopile's influence on the vessel's motion is also tested. It is concluded that the vessel's surge, sway, roll and yaw motion increases significantly due to the environmental forces on the monopile, which are passed through the gripper to the vessel. Finally, the workability of the vessel during the worst-case single failure is determined. After improving the DP-gains for particular sea conditions, the workability for the worst-case single failure was 96.0%. The failure results thus in a minor difference in the workability.
Upscaling the TetraSpar
Large-scale floating offshore wind turbines design methodology and modelling
Workability of a Floating XL-Monopile Installation
A vessel motion study
Turbine manufacturers demand that WTG towers are positioned vertically at all times. A qualitative assessment for all components points to transport and offloading of the turbine towers to be critical activities. A comparative motion response analysis between a barge and a heavy transport vessel (HTV) shows that during transport, both solutions perform well in sea states higher than the intended installation sea state, thus making them suitable for the task. As offloading demands stricter limits than transport, vessel motions for that activity are too severe. The natural frequency of the vessel-tower system increases with each removed turbine, moving into governing wave frequency ranges for North Sea conditions. This phenomenon shows for both vessel types, from which it is concluded that a supply vessel will be selected based on project specific parameters, rather than motion response.
During preliminary developments within Heerema, tipping of the tower when its sea fastening is released and large swinging motions of the tower after lift-off were main problems found during offloading, to which improvements are necessary. Three concept solutions are assessed: one an alteration of the existing, single tower lift solution, two others making use of the SSCV’s cranes with high capacity by respectively lifting a frame with 4 towers and two frames with 8 towers. For each concept, response limits are defined at relevant locations in the system. In-house software is used to determine the RAOs, from which the heading with the highest operability is computed. The offloading and installation activity sequence for wind farms of 48 and 96 turbines are defined, followed by a weather downtime assessment.
First simulations show waiting on weather (WoW) is governed by crew transfer from a crew supply vessel to the barge for mooring operations. This can be improved by using a crew basket, motion compensated gangway or HTV. Simulations with revised limits show that using a frame with 4 towers results in significantly lower WoW days and shortest net project times, making it the most promising concept. Shorter lifting exposure and reducing motion amplification by means of a low frequency system are drivers for the decrease in weather downtime. With a lower total project duration, costs are reduced substantially. ...
Turbine manufacturers demand that WTG towers are positioned vertically at all times. A qualitative assessment for all components points to transport and offloading of the turbine towers to be critical activities. A comparative motion response analysis between a barge and a heavy transport vessel (HTV) shows that during transport, both solutions perform well in sea states higher than the intended installation sea state, thus making them suitable for the task. As offloading demands stricter limits than transport, vessel motions for that activity are too severe. The natural frequency of the vessel-tower system increases with each removed turbine, moving into governing wave frequency ranges for North Sea conditions. This phenomenon shows for both vessel types, from which it is concluded that a supply vessel will be selected based on project specific parameters, rather than motion response.
During preliminary developments within Heerema, tipping of the tower when its sea fastening is released and large swinging motions of the tower after lift-off were main problems found during offloading, to which improvements are necessary. Three concept solutions are assessed: one an alteration of the existing, single tower lift solution, two others making use of the SSCV’s cranes with high capacity by respectively lifting a frame with 4 towers and two frames with 8 towers. For each concept, response limits are defined at relevant locations in the system. In-house software is used to determine the RAOs, from which the heading with the highest operability is computed. The offloading and installation activity sequence for wind farms of 48 and 96 turbines are defined, followed by a weather downtime assessment.
First simulations show waiting on weather (WoW) is governed by crew transfer from a crew supply vessel to the barge for mooring operations. This can be improved by using a crew basket, motion compensated gangway or HTV. Simulations with revised limits show that using a frame with 4 towers results in significantly lower WoW days and shortest net project times, making it the most promising concept. Shorter lifting exposure and reducing motion amplification by means of a low frequency system are drivers for the decrease in weather downtime. With a lower total project duration, costs are reduced substantially.
Preliminary design hold opening and load shifting system
Design for the Jumbo Maritime J1800-class vessels
requires the onboard cranes to open the hold, decreasing effective use of the cranes. Furthermore an expensive load shifting system is needed when a piece of cargo heavier than 900 tonnes has to be loaded on front of aft of the ship, due to crane limitations.
In this report a study is done into an integrated solution for both issues experienced by Jumbo Maritime. A system that is able to open the hold and to shift a load to front and aft of the vessel. First, specifications of the new system are defined, after which a literature study is done exploring the options currently available in the industry.
After that, multiple concepts are generated, after which an integrated system is selected using a comparison method between concepts. The concept selected consists of a load shifting system using the hatches. Opening of the hold is accomplished by rolling the hatches to the aft where a stacking system is located. First the concept is dimensioned and further designed. The new design incorporates a new seafastening design of the hatches, one of the major challenges encountered in the assignment. The new design is evaluated in
structural sense using the finite element analysis program ANSYS to prove its feasibility.
After structural feasibility is proven, the design is tested to its functional requirements and implications on operations for Jumbo Maritime are considered. The new system could reduce the minimum opening time
of the hold by a factor two and could save around half a million euros on skidding rental costs yearly. As the system is autonomous, the risks involved for humans decrease significantly, beneficial for Jumbo Maritime’s
goal of zero Lost Time Injuries. Furthermore the impact on the stability of the vessel is minimal, so there is no impact on cargo loading operations.
An economic analysis is conducted to see if it is attractive for Jumbo Maritime to convert the current system onboard of the J1800-class vessels. Considering conversion rates of €4/kg for the structural conversion costs, a total conversion time of 33 days, it is proven that it is beneficial for Jumbo Maritime to convert the current vessels, with an overall value investment ratio of 1.04 and the payback time being 5.3 years.
Overall is concluded that a new integrated system for load shifting and hold opening is attractive to further investigate for Jumbo Maritime, both for their current vessels as well as new build vessels. ...
requires the onboard cranes to open the hold, decreasing effective use of the cranes. Furthermore an expensive load shifting system is needed when a piece of cargo heavier than 900 tonnes has to be loaded on front of aft of the ship, due to crane limitations.
In this report a study is done into an integrated solution for both issues experienced by Jumbo Maritime. A system that is able to open the hold and to shift a load to front and aft of the vessel. First, specifications of the new system are defined, after which a literature study is done exploring the options currently available in the industry.
After that, multiple concepts are generated, after which an integrated system is selected using a comparison method between concepts. The concept selected consists of a load shifting system using the hatches. Opening of the hold is accomplished by rolling the hatches to the aft where a stacking system is located. First the concept is dimensioned and further designed. The new design incorporates a new seafastening design of the hatches, one of the major challenges encountered in the assignment. The new design is evaluated in
structural sense using the finite element analysis program ANSYS to prove its feasibility.
After structural feasibility is proven, the design is tested to its functional requirements and implications on operations for Jumbo Maritime are considered. The new system could reduce the minimum opening time
of the hold by a factor two and could save around half a million euros on skidding rental costs yearly. As the system is autonomous, the risks involved for humans decrease significantly, beneficial for Jumbo Maritime’s
goal of zero Lost Time Injuries. Furthermore the impact on the stability of the vessel is minimal, so there is no impact on cargo loading operations.
An economic analysis is conducted to see if it is attractive for Jumbo Maritime to convert the current system onboard of the J1800-class vessels. Considering conversion rates of €4/kg for the structural conversion costs, a total conversion time of 33 days, it is proven that it is beneficial for Jumbo Maritime to convert the current vessels, with an overall value investment ratio of 1.04 and the payback time being 5.3 years.
Overall is concluded that a new integrated system for load shifting and hold opening is attractive to further investigate for Jumbo Maritime, both for their current vessels as well as new build vessels.
A probabilistic approach to pipeline start-up structure installations
Structural reliability assessment utilizing the resistance parameters