Guide Development for eHealth Interventions Targeting People With a Low Socioeconomic Position: Participatory Design Approach

Faber, J.S.; Al-Dhahir, Isra; Kraal, J.J.; Breeman, Linda D.; Reijnders, Thomas; van Dijk, S.; Visch, V.T.; Chavannes, N.H.; Evers, A.W.M.

doi:10.2196/48461

Guide Development for eHealth Interventions Targeting People With a Low Socioeconomic Position

Title

Guide Development for eHealth Interventions Targeting People With a Low Socioeconomic Position: Participatory Design Approach

Author

Faber, J.S. (TU Delft Design Aesthetics)
Al-Dhahir, Isra (Universiteit Leiden)
Kraal, J.J. (TU Delft Applied Ergonomics and Design)
Breeman, Linda D. (Universiteit Leiden)
Reijnders, Thomas (Universiteit Leiden)
van Dijk, S. (Universiteit Leiden)
Visch, V.T. (TU Delft Design Aesthetics)
Chavannes, N.H. (Leiden University Medical Center)
Evers, A.W.M. (TU Delft Applied Ergonomics and Design; Universiteit Leiden)

Date

2023

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with a low socioeconomic position (SEP) are less likely to benefit from eHealth interventions, exacerbating social health inequalities. Professionals developing eHealth interventions for this group face numerous challenges. A comprehensive guide to support these professionals in their work could mitigate these inequalities. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a web-based guide to support professionals in the development, adaptation, evaluation, and implementation of eHealth interventions for people with a low SEP. METHODS: This study consisted of 2 phases. The first phase involved a secondary analysis of 2 previous qualitative and quantitative studies. In this phase, we synthesized insights from the previous studies to develop the guide's content and information structure. In the second phase, we used a participatory design process. This process included iterative development and evaluation of the guide's design with 11 professionals who had experience with both eHealth and the target group. We used test versions (prototypes) and think-aloud testing combined with semistructured interviews and a questionnaire to identify design requirements and develop and adapt the guide accordingly. RESULTS: The secondary analysis resulted in a framework of recommendations for developing the guide, which was categorized under 5 themes: development, reach, adherence, evaluation, and implementation. The participatory design process resulted in 16 requirements on system, content, and service aspects for the design of the guide. For the system category, the guide was required to have an open navigation strategy leading to more specific information and short pages with visual elements. Content requirements included providing comprehensible information, scientific evidence, a user perspective, information on practical applications, and a personal and informal tone of voice. Service requirements involved improving suitability for different professionals, ensuring long-term viability, and a focus on implementation. Based on these requirements, we developed the final version of "the inclusive eHealth guide." CONCLUSIONS: The inclusive eHealth guide provides a practical, user-centric tool for professionals aiming to develop, adapt, evaluate, and implement eHealth interventions for people with a low SEP, with the aim of reducing health disparities in this population. Future research should investigate its suitability for different end-user goals, its external validity, its applicability in specific contexts, and its real-world impact on social health inequality.

Subject

eHealth
guide
guidelines professionals
intervention development
intervention evaluation
low socioeconomic position
low socioeconomic status
risk groups
tailored care
OA-Fund TU Delft