Passive seismic reflection interferometry

Passive seismic reflection interferometry: A case study from the aquistore CO₂ storage site, Saskatchewan, Canada

Cheraghi, Saeid (Geological Survey of Canada)
White, Donald J. (Geological Survey of Canada)
Draganov, D.S. (TU Delft Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)
Bellefleur, Gilles (Geological Survey of Canada)
Craven, James A. (Geological Survey of Canada)
Roberts, Brian (Geological Survey of Canada)

2017-05-01

Seismic reflection interferometry has recently been tested in a few resource-exploration applications. We have evaluated passive seismic interferometry results for data from the Aquistore CO₂ storage site, Saskatchewan, Canada, with the objective of testing the method's ability to image the subsurface geology and its potential for time-lapse imaging. We analyzed passive seismic data recorded along two perpendicular geophone lines for two time periods that include 23 days in June 2014 and 13 days in February 2015. Beam-forming analysis showed that a nearby power plant is the dominant source of ambient noise. We retrieved virtual shot gathers not only by correlating long noise panels (1 h) for both recording periods, but also by correlating shorter noise panels (10 s) from two days of each recording period. We applied illumination diagnosis to the noise panels from the two chosen days for each period to help suppress the surface waves. Comparisons of the common-midpoints stacked sections, resulting from the virtual shot gathers, with colocated active-source images and log-based synthetic seismograms showed that the best ambient-noise images were obtained for the longest recording periods. The application of illumination diagnosis revealed that only a small percentage of the noise panels are dominated by body waves. Thus, images formed using only this subset of noise panels failed to improve the images obtained from the 23 and 13 days of noise recording.To evaluate the passive images, we performed log-based correlations that showed moderate correlation ranging from approximately 0.5-0.65 in the two-way time range of 0.8-1.5 s. For the 13 to 23 days of noise used in our analysis, the resulting images at the reservoir depth of 3200 m or ~1.85 s are unlikely to be suitable for time-lapse imaging at this site. This is most likely due to the limited directional illumination and dominance of surface-wave noise.

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:a1ff6fd5-1052-4c0f-9ede-d846c3bc28dd

https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2016-0370.1

0016-8033

Geophysics, 82 (3), B79-B93

Institutional Repository

journal article

© 2017 Saeid Cheraghi, Donald J. White, D.S. Draganov, Gilles Bellefleur, James A. Craven, Brian Roberts